Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.66 seconds)
Documents citing Sehgal School Of Competition, vs Dalbir Singh, on 10 December, 2008

D.N. Kochhar vs Fiit Jee Ltd. on 26 August, 2011

"In the case Sehgal School of Competition Vs. Dalbir Singh, 2009 (3) CPC 187, there existed such a condition in the brochure issued by the petitioner from whose side, an argument was advanced that the fee was non refundable or non­transferable under any circumstances. His contention was not accepted by the learned District Forum which held that any clause saying that fees once paid will not be refunded is unconscionable and unfair and therefore not enforceable. The appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the revision petition was also dismissed by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter to be referred as National Commission).
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Fiit Jee Limited vs Sh. Manmeet Singh on 24 March, 2011

In the case Sehgal School of Competition Vs. Dalbir Singh, 2009 (3) CPC 187, there existed such a condition in the brochure issued by the petitioner from whose side, an argument was advanced that the fee was non refundable or non-transferable under any circumstances. His contention was not accepted by the learned District Forum which held that any clause saying that fees once paid will not be refunded is unconscionable and unfair and therefore not enforceable. The appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the revision petition was also dismissed by the Honble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter to be referred as National Commission).
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Manmeet vs Fiitjee on 24 March, 2011

In the case Sehgal School of Competition Vs. Dalbir Singh, 2009 (3) CPC 187, there existed such a condition in the brochure issued by the petitioner from whose side, an argument was advanced that the fee was non refundable or non-transferable under any circumstances. His contention was not accepted by the learned District Forum which held that any clause saying that fees once paid will not be refunded is unconscionable and unfair and therefore not enforceable. The appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the revision petition was also dismissed by the Honble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter to be referred as National Commission).
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Fiitjee Ltd vs Ms. Alka Khurana on 28 January, 2011

11. In this case, the classes for the pinnacle two year integrated programme were to commence from June, 2009 and Master Dhiraj Khurana, complainant No.2 attended the classes for few days and thereafter discontinued the studies in June, 2009 due to unavoidable circumstances and requested the OP for the refund of the amount deposited with the OP, which the OP refused to refund the said amount. On the refusal of the OP for the refund of the amount, the complainants filed the complaint in the learned District Forum. The learned District Forum allowed the complaint in favour of the complainants relying on the case law titled as Sehgal School of Competition Vs. Dalbir Singh, III (2009) CPJ 44 (NC).
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neha Gupta vs 1. The Director, on 29 November, 2012

i) Sehgal School of Competition Vs. Dalbir Singh, reported in III (2009) CPJ 33 (NC) In that case the State Commission had held that clause saying that fees once paid, not refundable, is unconscionable, unfair and not enforceable. As per the public notice issued by U.G.C., all institutes are directed to refund money of students for period, college/institution is not attended. The said order was upheld by the Hon'ble National Commission in revision petition No.813/2009
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fiit Jee Ltd. vs Ms. Shinjini Tewari on 11 July, 2019

In view of law settled in the case of Sehgal School of Competition (supra), the Forum rightly ordered refund of the entire fee collected from the respondent/complainant towards admission of her son after deduction of the processing fee of not more than Rs.1,000/- besides awarding Rs.25,000/- and Rs.10,000/- towards compensation for mental and physical harassment and litigation cost.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next