Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Shimbhu Singh & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 29 January, 2018

Anup Khati @ Kaliya vs State on 5 May, 2018

In Shimbhu Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), the petition under section 482 CrPC was filed after the decision of the High Court in the criminal appeal and, therefore, the Division Bench has held that after final decision in the appeal, the petition under section 482 CrPC with a prayer for issuing directions to run 10 different sentences concurrently is not maintainable as this Court has become functus officio.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V Bishnoi - Full Document

Daljeet Singh vs State on 12 September, 2019

In Shimbhu Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), the petition under section 482 CrPC was filed after the decision of the High Court in the criminal appeal and, therefore, the Division Bench has held that after final decision in the appeal, the petition under section 482 CrPC with a prayer for issuing directions to run different sentences concurrently is not maintainable as this Court has become functus officio.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - P S Bhati - Full Document

Smt Pushpa Jindal vs State on 5 May, 2018

In Shimbhu Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), a petition under section 482 CrPC was filed after the decision of the High Court in the criminal appeal and, therefore, the Division Bench has held that after final decision in the appeal, the petition under section 482 CrPC with a prayer for issuing directions to run different sentences concurrently is not maintainable as this Court has become functus officio. However, in the present case, a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioner against the judgment of appellate court is pending consideration before this Court and has not yet been decided, and in respect of two other cases, no appeal or revision is filed by the petitioner before this Court. Hence, it cannot be said that this Court has become functus officio. As such the above referred judgment has no applicability.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - V Bishnoi - Full Document

Anil @ Leelu vs State on 5 May, 2018

In Shimbhu Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), a petition under section 482 CrPC was filed after the decision of the High Court in the criminal appeal and, therefore, the Division Bench has held that after final decision in the appeal, the petition under section 482 CrPC with a prayer for issuing directions to run different sentences concurrently is not maintainable as this Court has become functus officio. However, in the present case, no revision is filed by the petitioner against the judgment of 8 the appellate court, whereby the sentences awarded to him by the trial court has been affirmed. As such, the above referred judgment has no applicability in the present case.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V Bishnoi - Full Document
1