B B M Impex Pvt Ltd vs New Delhi on 12 June, 2020
(ii) Techno Marketing Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata 2004
(164) E.L.T. 113 (Tri.- Del)
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.23 seconds)Documents citing
Techno Marketing vs Commissioner Of Customs on 18 November, 2003
M/S Signal Bearing Co vs Cce, Delhi -Iv on 1 June, 2011
4. These guidelines of Commissioner of Customs (Imports) Mumbai have been issued after deliberating upon the issue through extensive and exhaustive studies conducted with cooperation/involvement of Commissioner (Valuation), Mumbai, DG DRI, Delhi, Commissioner of Customs (Prev.), Mumbai, Commissioners of Customs at Nhava Sheva, Chennai, Kolkatta, ICD TKD New Delhi. The Honble CESTAT, Northern Bench, New Delhi vide its Final Order No. 640/2003-NB(A) dated 1.11.2003 in the matter of M/s Techno Marketing Vs Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata reported at 2004 (164) ELT 113 (Tri-Delhi) has upheld the validity of such guidelines issued by the Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, in the case of import of loud speakers. While accepting that the values indicated in the letter of Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai have been arrived at after considering the prices observed in trade and as well as other sources.
Cc, Icd, Tkd, New Delhi vs M/S.Polyglass Acrylic Mfg. Co.Ltd on 11 November, 2013
28. Ld. Member (Judicial) relied upon the decision of Tribunal in case of M/s D.M. International C/A/114/12-Cus dated 30.03.2012 on the same issue in rejecting Revenues appeal. On the other hand Ld. Member Technical relied upon the decision of Tribunal in case of Varun Overseas (Supra) and M/s Techno Marketing (Supra) in upholding the loading of assessable value by the original authority.
1