Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.18 seconds)

Meena vs Ludhiana Improvement Trust on 6 December, 2017

The complainant claimed that in case, the alleged plots are not available in 475 acres scheme, then another plot in equally developed scheme be allotted to her, as per terms and conditions at the same price, but to no effect. The alleged deficiency in service on the part of OPs for non allotment of the alternative plot to her has been pleaded in this case, which has caused mental and physical harassment to her. In case, OPs would have given the possession of the plot No.666-G in time to the complainant, then she would have been saved from the unnecessary harassment undergone by her. As per operative part of the case of Baljit Singh vs. The Secretary, Govt. of Punjab dated 31.10.2006, the Trust felt necessity for calling upon the Government to reconsider the resolution No.3 dated 31.01.2005 because of filing of Writ Petitions before the Hon'ble High Court by applicants. Vide resolution No.8, Resolution No.3 dated 31.01.2005 was reconsidered and approved.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1