Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing T.C.C. Thozhilali Union vs T.C.C. Ltd. on 20 January, 1982

South Indian Plantation Workers Union vs K.D.H.P Company Private Ltd on 17 September, 2012

In T.C.C.Thozilali Union v. T.C.C.Ltd. (1982 KLT 125) referring to Sec.2(k) of the ID Act, this Court dealt with the power to recognise the unions. In paragraph 7, the dispute concerning the Company and the Union in that case was stated as whether in the discussions and deliberations in respect of, or relating to the workers to be held by the Company and the representatives of its workers, such of the Company's workers who are members of the Union should be permitted to be represented by, and/or to have as their bargaining agent, the Union.
Kerala High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - T Joseph - Full Document

The Cochin Refineries Employees ... vs The Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd on 23 August, 2016

In T.C.C. Thoziali Union v. T.C.C. Ltd.3, this Court, per a learned Single Judge, has percipiently presented the legal principle that instructs what a trade dispute is: A trade union, in claiming locus standi to represent its members in the employment of a company, does so on behalf the workers who are its members. If 31982 KLT 125 W.A.No.1860 of 2016 16 the employer refuses to accept a claim or to recognize the union as its members' representative and bargaining agent, a difference or dispute is said to have arisen between the employer and such of its employees who are members of the union which claims the status of a bargaining agent. When such difference is "connected with the employment, non-employment, the terms of employment, or with the conditions of labour, of any person," it is an industrial or trade dispute.
Kerala High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - D S Naidu - Full Document

Indian Airlines Technical Assistants ... vs The Chairman And Managing Director, ... on 5 July, 1994

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that registration of union was by itself ineffective unless it was recognised and the denial of such recognition was untenable and offended the provisions of the Constitution guaranteeing the freedom of association. It was also submitted that refusal to recognise the petitioner-Union while recognising the other unions even with less members is discriminatory. The last submission was that there was a legitimate expectation to be treated fairly and the refusal of the management to grant interview to the petitioner-Union is arbitrary and untenable. The learned Counsel for the respondents submitted that there was no right for the Trade Union to be recognised as it has been held by the Supreme Court in Delhi Police Non-Gazetted Karmachari Sangh v. U. I. , that such right is not a fundamental right and such a dispute cannot also be entertained in a suit as held by the High Court of Kerala in T. C. C. Thozhilali Union v. T. C. C. Ltd. 1983 (1) LLJ 425.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 9 - Cited by 5 - T N Rangarajan - Full Document
1