Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.25 seconds)

O.S./3964/2015 on 16 April, 2022

In a decision reported in [2012] 8 Supreme Court Cases 516 (Ahmedsaheb [dead] by L.Rs and others Vs. Sayyed Ismail) wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court held that, "It is needless to emphasize that admission of a party in the proceedings either in the pleadings or oral is the best evidence and same does not need any further corroboration". The said decision is aptly applicable to the case in hand. In this case also P.W.1 in his cross-examination unequivocally admitted that the land bearing Sy.No.67 of Okalipuram Village has been acquired by B.D.A. Plaintiff being aware about the acquisition of land bearing Sy.No.67 of Okalipuram Village has filed the present suit claiming that he is in possession of the suit schedule property.
Bangalore District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

O.S./4129/2019 on 16 April, 2022

In a decision reported in [2012] 8 Supreme Court Cases 516 (Ahmedsaheb [dead] by L.Rs and others Vs. Sayyed Ismail) wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court held that, "It is needless to emphasize that admission of a party in the proceedings either in the pleadings or oral is the best evidence and same does not need any further corroboration". The said decisions are aptly applicable to the case in hand. In this case also P.W.1 in her cross- examination unequivocally admitted that defendant No.1 has acquired said properties from her parents. Once defendant No.1 acquired properties under partition it becomes her absolute properties. Neither husband of the plaintiff nor plaintiff will get rights over the said properties.
Bangalore District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1