Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (1.89 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Kaushaliya And Others on 1 October, 1963

Pronab Kumar Mukherjee And Ors. vs State Of West Bengal And Ors. on 19 June, 1974

Such is also the view of our Supreme Court underlying the decision in the case of State of U. P. v. Kaushaliya, . Judged from this point of view, it must be held that though the Statute under consideration differentiates the properties brought within its pale in the matter of payment of compensation, yet such differentiation being based on a reasonable classification and having rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the Statute, must be held not to be violative of Article 14. The first point raised by Mr. Chakraborty therefore fails and is overruled.
Calcutta High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

State Of Punjab And Anr vs Devans Modern Brewaries Ltd. And Anr on 20 November, 2003

"(1)While considering the reasonableness of the restrictions, the court has to keep in mind the Directive Principles of State Policy. (2) Restrictions must not be arbitrary or of an excessive nature so as to go beyond the requirement of the interest of the general public. (3) In order to judge the reasonableness of the restrictions, no abstract or general pattern or a fixed principle can be laid down so as to be of universal application and the same will vary from case to case as also with regard to changing conditions, values of human life, social philosophy of the Constitution, prevailing conditions and the surrounding circumstances. (4) A just balance has to be struck between the restrictions imposed and the social control envisaged by Clause (6) of Article 19. (5) Prevailing social values as also social needs which are intended to be satisfied by restrictions have to be borne in mind. (See State of U.P. v. Kaushaliya.
Supreme Court of India Cites 194 - Cited by 555 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document
1