Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.93 seconds)
Documents citing Sat Pal Sharma And Anr. vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 22 March, 1968

M.L. Goyal And Ors. vs State Of Raj. And Ors. on 25 November, 1970

19. I have considered the cases cited on behalf of the petitioners, but they are all clearly distinguishable. Thus in Sat Pal Sharma and Anr. v. State of Punjab 1968 (II) SLR 848 there was some delay in filing the writ petition. The views of their Lordships of the Supreme Court were not, however, brought to the notice of their Lordships of the Punjab and Hariyana High Court. Even so, they observed that if the learned Single Judge, against whose judgment they were hearing the appeal, had dismissed the petition merely on the ground of delay, they would have declined to go into the merits of the controversy.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P N Shinghal - Full Document

I.D. Garg And Ors. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 19 August, 1977

A full Bench of the Punjab High Court took a similar view in case of Sat Pal Sharma & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.(11) A Division Bench of this Court expressed a similar view in the case of R. Prasad v. Union of India & 0rs.(12) decided by Jagjit Singh & Safeer, JJ., on January 31, 1972. There is thus sufficient authority for the propositions that the expression is one of wide import and should be liberally construed; that promotion was one of the matters which would be within the expression; and since seniority plays an important part in the matter of promotion, and has assumed a special significance in relation to the service under the State by virtue of the provision of Article 16 of the Constitution of India, Rules relating to seniority would be likewise within the expression. If promotion is a matter which relates to the condition of service of a public servant and the seniority plays an important part in the matter of promotion, it follows that the seniority could not be outside the expression "conditions of service."
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Karamjit Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 17 September, 2018

In this regard, reliance has been placed on Rule 4.4(a) of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Vol.-I, Part-I and the authorities (i) "Selvaraj vs. Lt. Governor of Island, Port Blair and others", 1998(4) SCC 291; (ii) CWP No. 4552 of 2003 titled as "Darshan Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and others" decided on 01.07.2010; (iii) LPA No. 1539 of 2010 titled as "State of Punjab and others vs. Darshan Singh and another" decided on 15.11.2010; (iv) CWP No. 6010 of 1992 titled as "S.S. Sharma vs. State of Punjab and others" decided on 20.10.1992.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - J Chauhan - Full Document
1