Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing H.B. Chaturvedi vs State & Anr. on 12 November, 2014

Complainant vs . on 29 April, 2015

Ld. Counsel for the accused has placed reliance on two case laws titled as H.B. Chaturvedi Vs. State & Anr. 2006(1) ALD Cri 52 and Mrs. Aparna A. Shah Vs. M/s Sheth Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Cri. Appl. No.813 of 2013; and vi. That in the cross­examination of defence witness no question was asked regarding the defence raised by the accused and therefore the entire evidence has gone un­rebutted which is deemed to have been admitted by the complainant.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Complainant vs . on 29 April, 2015

v. That no evidence has been led by the complainant to show that accused no.2 & 3 are Chairman and Managing Director of accused no.1 and there is nothing to show that they were responsible for day to day affairs of accused no.1 company. Accused no.2 & 3 have not signed the cheques and therefore they are not liable to be prosecuted u/s 138 of N.I. Act. Ld. Counsel for the accused has placed reliance on two case laws titled as H.B. Chaturvedi Vs. State & Anr. 2006(1) ALD Cri 52 and Mrs. Aparna A. Shah Vs. M/s Sheth Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Cri. Appl. No.813 of 2013; and vi. That in the cross­examination of defence witness no question was asked regarding the defence raised by the accused and therefore the entire evidence has gone un­rebutted which is deemed to have been admitted by the complainant.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1