Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Ramji Lal And Others vs State Of Haryana And Another on 22 September, 2008

Kuldeep Singh @ Karamjit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 20 January, 2023

In "Ram Lal and others vs State of Haryana and another", 2008(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 823, it has been held by this Court (a coordinate Bench) that when the parties entered into a compromise but complainant backs out from the same, the FIR is liable to be quashed in such like situations. It will be apt to reproduce the relevant paragraph, which is as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Saroj Kumari vs Union Territory on 19 July, 2010

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the compromise has been accepted by respondent No.2 and he has also accepted an amount of Rs.12 lacs, in cash, but he has backed out from the compromise to withdraw proceedings and to make any statement for quashing of FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Mohd. Shamim vs. Smt. Nahid Begum 2005(1) RCR (Criminal) 697 and judgment of this Court in Ram Lal and others Vs. State of Haryana and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 823 to support his contention.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - D Chaudhary - Full Document

Naresh Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 9 May, 2016

Therefore, having regard to the judgment passed in Ram Lal's case (supra), the complainant has no right to back out from the compromise particularly when he has received the total consideration towards full and final settlement and he has made the statement in the affidavit that he has no dispute with the petitioner in any manner. This term in any manner not to be read in narrow sense rather it includes the quashing of FIR as well. By not coming forward to make statement in support of the affidavit, the complainant intends to take extra benefit without there being any right whatsoever. This act on the part of respondent No.2 backing out from the compromise shows his greediness.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - H P Verma - Full Document
1   2 Next