Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.49 seconds)

Pinkal Sureshkumar Kothari,Ahmedabad vs The Ito, Ward-5(2)(1), Ahmedabad on 27 August, 2025

9. These facts were demonstrated to us from the documents on record before the AO and the Ld. CIT(A) which included the copy of bank statement of the assessee from where the entire investment was shown to have been made by the assessee. The Ld.DR was unable to controvert the said facts. The Ld. CIT(A), I have noted, completely misunderstood the pleadings of the assessee. He has noted that the balance amount of Rs.6.39 Lakhs as from the cash withdrawals made on different occasions and finding the AO to have already given a credit of Rs.11.50 Lakhs for cash deposits out of cash withdrawals, he rejected the assessee's explanation. The records before us demonstrate that it was only investment to the tune of Rs.2.94 Lakhs on account of stamp duty paid for acquiring property, which was made in cash. Therefore, finding of the Ld.CIT(A) that investment to the extent of Rs.6.39 Lakhs was made from cash withdrawals is incorrect. Further, the cash paid for stamp duty purposes was the only component funded from cash withdrawals. Cop y of cash book furnished by the assessee to the authorities below reveals that there was more than sufficient cash withdrawals made by the assessee for the said purposes, which, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee pointed out amounted in all to Rs.16.98 Lakhs, out of which, even after giving credit of Rs.11.50 Lakhs for cash deposited in bank, which credit was given b y the AO, there ITA No.1303/Ahd/2025 [Pinkal Sureshkumar Kothari vs. ITO] A.Y. 2017-18 -8- remains sufficient amount available with the assessee for investment in purchase of impugned property on account of stamp duty paid thereon amounting to Rs.2.94 Lakhs. Therefore, I hold that the source of investment in the propert y purchased by the assessee during the impugned year to the tune of Rs.62.94 Lakhs stands fully explained and the addition, therefore, confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) to the tune of Rs.6.39 Lakhs is not sustainable and is directed to be deleted.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Mohit Minerals Pvt.Ltd., New Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 1 February, 2024

"7 . The Tribunal, i n our vi ew, has c orrectl y appreci at ed t he positi on in law whi ch is that when a n une xplai ned cre dit is found i n the books of account of a n as ses se e the i nitial onus is placed on the assessee. The ass essee is requi red to disc ha rge thi s ini tial onus . Once t hat onus is discharge d, it is for t he revenue to prove that the credit found in t he books of acc ounts of the ass es se e is the undisclosed income of t he assess ee. In the circ umsta nc es obtaini ng in the present cas e, i n our vi ew, the ass ess ee has di sc harged that initial onus. The ass ess ee is not requi red therea ft er t o prov e the genui nenes s o f t he t ransacti ons as betwe en its c redit ors and that of the credit ors ' s ource of i ncome, i. e., t he sub- cr editors (S ee Nemi C hand Kothari vs CIT & A nr. (2003) 264 ITR 254 a nd judgme nt of this co urt i n ITA No. 1158/2007 Mod Creati ons Pvt. Ltd. vs Inc ome Tax Offic er dec ided on 29.08.2007).
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ... vs M/S Mohit Minerals Pvt.Ltd., New Delhi on 1 February, 2024

"7 . The Tribunal, i n our vi ew, has c orrectl y appreci at ed t he positi on in law whi ch is that when a n une xplai ned cre dit is found i n the books of account of a n as ses se e the i nitial onus is placed on the assessee. The ass essee is requi red to disc ha rge thi s ini tial onus . Once t hat onus is discharge d, it is for t he revenue to prove that the credit found in t he books of acc ounts of the ass es se e is the undisclosed income of t he assess ee. In the circ umsta nc es obtaini ng in the present cas e, i n our vi ew, the ass ess ee has di sc harged that initial onus. The ass ess ee is not requi red therea ft er t o prov e the genui nenes s o f t he t ransacti ons as betwe en its c redit ors and that of the credit ors ' s ource of i ncome, i. e., t he sub- cr editors (S ee Nemi C hand Kothari vs CIT & A nr. (2003) 264 ITR 254 a nd judgme nt of this co urt i n ITA No. 1158/2007 Mod Creati ons Pvt. Ltd. vs Inc ome Tax Offic er dec ided on 29.08.2007).
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1