Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing Ashok Kumar Agarwal vs Collector Of C. Ex. on 19 August, 1988

Pheonix International Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Cus. on 5 May, 1999

15. Shri Doiphode cited Calcutta High Court judgment in the case of Sandip Agarwal v. C.C. - 1992 (62) E.L.T. 528. We have perused paragraph 29 of the judgement. The clarification obtained by Customs authorities from the office of the C.C.I. & E, was not given importance by the High Court on the ground that it was signed by the DCCI & E and it was not claimed to be on behalf of the C.C.I. & E. The Court however, acknowledged that DCCI & E was competent to give clarification on any provision of the Policy Import and procedure or any itemwise entry in consultation with the concerned technical authority or the Headquarter Clarification Committee. We have also seen the extracts of the Export and Import Policy (AM 1997-2002). In paragraph 4.13 it, is stated as follows :
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Shantilal M. Jain And Shri Prakash ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 17 February, 2004

vi) Ashok Kumar Agarwal v. Collector of C.Ex. --1989(41) ELT 454 (Tribunal) He particularly draws attention of the Bench to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of State of Gujarat (Supra) where it has been held that Court can not sit in appeal whether or not the official concerned had seized the goods in reasonable belief but should accept the "reasonable belief" irrespective of the fact that the Court might not have entertained the same belief. He also relies on the same judgment to state that when gold of high purity was seized in the reasonable belief that it was smuggled gold, burden of proof shifts to the person from whom it was seized to establish that it was not smuggled gold in view of the provisions of Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962. He further points out the Apex Court's view expressed in the said decision that iaw declared by the said Court was binding on the High Court and that it was not open to the High Court to do exactly what it was cautioned against by the Apex Court in the context of Section 1,23 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1