Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.62 seconds)
Documents citing Mahabir Ram vs Ram Krishen Ram And Ors. on 7 September, 1936

Harishankar Lath And Ors. vs General Merchants Ltd. on 15 February, 1956

In support of his contention that 'partner' in Order 30, Civil P. C. means a partner by contract and not by personal law and the 'firm' does not include joint family business, learned counsel relied upon the cases of 'Ramchandra Ramkisan v. Narayandas Sundarlal 1936 Nag 292 (AIR V23) (A); Mahabir Ram v. Ram Krishen Ram', 1936 All 855 (AIR V23) (B), 'Lalchand Amonmal v. M. C. Boid and Co.', 1934 Cal 810 (AIR V21) (C) and 'Motilal Chhajulal v. Giridharilal Rameshwsrlar, 1942 Cal 613 (AIR V29) (D).
Orissa High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Khairati Ram And Ors. vs Firm Balak Ram Mehr Chand And Anr. on 21 August, 1959

Bennet J. made a similar observation in Mahabir Ram v. Ram Krishan Ram, AIR 1936 All 855, but in this case he was making a distinction between a joint family irm and a partnership firm. He observed that the members of the joint Hindu family must be looked upon as a body of individuals who come under the definition of 'person' as defined in the General Clauses Act. He, however, used this argument to show that a joint Hindu family cannot have a partnership by itself as long as it remains a joint Hindu family.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Kunj Bihari & Others vs Ganga Sahai Pandey & Another on 3 July, 2013

In Mahabir Ram Vs. Ram Kishen Ram AIR 1936 All. 855, another distinction was pointed out between a partnership firm and a joint Hindu family. It was held that "partnership" deals with a relation which subsists between persons, i.e., there must be more persons than one. A joint Hindu family is a single person, and it cannot have a partnership by itself so long as it remains a joint Hindu family. A joint Hindu family is a unit to which no outsider can be admitted by agreement, since it is a status which can only be acquired by birth or adoption.
Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 7 - S Agarwal - Full Document
1