New Balaji Electronics vs Riico Ltd. And Anr. on 9 August, 2007
9. On facts, all the three cases have no co-relation with the fact situation of the present case; and on principles, as explained by the Division Bench in Suzuki Processors (supra), the present one is not a fit case to be entertained in writ jurisdiction. It cannot be said on the basis of the material placed on record that this is an admitted and undeniable position that the petitioners are lessees and that they are not liable to be proceeded under the Act of 1964 at all. Even the so-called letter permitting transfer (Annex.4) states that if the conditions were not complied with, proceedings could be undertaken as per the terms of the lease-deed. In the circumstances of this case, for what has been suggested in this writ petition, there was no impediment for the petitioners in responding to the notice and in making their position clear by filing reply.