citedby: 31366276

1 - 8 of 8 (0.97 seconds)

Documents citing Pradeep Kumar Sharma vs State Of Chhatisgarh on 25 August, 2014

Dileep vs State Of U.P. on 26 May, 2023

In Pradeep Kumar v. State of Chhatisgarh, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 239 the Apex Court laying down the principle regarding the appreciation of circumstantial evidence has held as under :-

Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - R Chaturvedi - Full Document

State vs Amit Sharma @ Bunti And Others on 29 February, 2024

In Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Chhatisgarh 2023 Live Law SC, Hon'ble Supreme Court reiterated that in cases where heavy reliance is placed on circumstantial evidence, where two views are possible, one pointing towards the guilt of the accused and other towards his innocence, the one which is favourable to the accused must be adopted.

Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sandipkumar Sureshbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 9 March, 2026

4.8. Relying on judgments such as Devilal Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in [2019 (19) SCC 447], Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Chhatisgarh reported in [2023(5) SCC 350], Indrakunwar Vs. State of Chhatisgarh reported in [AIR 2023 SC 5221: 2023(0) AIJEL SC 72661], and Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in [1984 (4) SCC 116], it is urged that the chain of circumstances is broken, evidence unreliable, and conviction perverse, praying for acquittal to prevent miscarriage of justice.

Gujarat High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - I J Vora - Full Document

Stm. Ramdulari Dhiman vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 9 January, 2015

Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with the following directions :- i) Clause-3 of the policy dated 3.9.2005 fixing the cut off date 1.8.2003 to grant the benefit of second Krammonnati to the teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory, hence quashed. ii) Teachers of education Department or Tribal welfare Department are held entitled to get the benefit of Krammonnati under the policy dated 21.3.1983, 19.4.1999 and 2.11.2001 in accordance with the terms and conditions as specified therein. iii) In view of the said directions, if the orders of recovery passed by the Government against petitioners are quashed, and if any amount is recovered Prerna from them for said reasons be refunded back to them within three months with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, on failure to comply the said directions within the aforesaid time, the interest at the rate 9% per annum will be levyable. iv) In some of the cases the benefit of second Krammonnati has not been allowed to the petitioners, however on due consideration of their cases, the respondents are directed to do the needful in accordance with the policy dated 21.3.1983, 19.4.1999, 2.11.2001 and 3.9.2005 and settled their claim including post retiral and pensionary benefits within the period of six months from today and the arrears thereof be released along with permissible amount of interest under the law.%u201D It is observed that petitioner has directly approached this Court without filing any application before the authorities. In view of the aforesaid the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with the direction to the fact that in case the petitioner file representation before the authorities claiming the aforesaid benefit along with the copy of the order passed today and the copy of this petition, the concerned authority shall examine the same keeping in mind the order passed by this Court in the case of Smt. Prerna (supra) and by the Chhatisgarh High Court in the case of Om Prakash Sharma (supra) expeditiously in accordance with law and in case the petitioner is found entitled, benefit of the same shall be extended to the petitioner. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and therefore, the authority would be at liberty to examine the matter keeping all facts and facets into consideration and thereafter either accept or reject the representation by passing a reasoned order. With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C. as per rules. (Ms. Vandana Kasrekar) Judge manju  <object type="application/pdf" id="ggg_object" style="display: none"></object>  </div>

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Chakrawarti vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 January, 2015

Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with the following directions :- i) Clause-3 of the policy dated 3.9.2005 fixing the cut off date 1.8.2003 to grant the benefit of second Krammonnati to the teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory, hence quashed. ii) Teachers of education Department or Tribal welfare Department are held entitled to get the benefit of Krammonnati under the policy dated 21.3.1983, 19.4.1999 and 2.11.2001 in accordance with the terms and conditions as specified therein. iii) In view of the said directions, if the orders of recovery passed by the Government against petitioners are quashed, and if any amount is recovered Prerna from them for said reasons be refunded back to them within three months with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, on failure to comply the said directions within the aforesaid time, the interest at the rate 9% per annum will be levyable. iv) In some of the cases the benefit of second Krammonnati has not been allowed to the petitioners, however on due consideration of their cases, the respondents are directed to do the needful in accordance with the policy dated 21.3.1983, 19.4.1999, 2.11.2001 and 3.9.2005 and settled their claim including post retiral and pensionary benefits within the period of six months from today and the arrears thereof be released along with permissible amount of interest under the law.%u201D It is observed that petitioners have directly approached this Court without filing any application before the authorities. In view of the aforesaid the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with the direction to the fact that in case the petitioners file representation before the authorities claiming the aforesaid benefit along with the copy of the order passed today and the copy of this petition, the concerned authority shall examine the same keeping in mind the order passed by this Court in the case of Smt. Prerna (supra) and by the Chhatisgarh High Court in the case of Om Prakash Sharma (supra) expeditiously in accordance with law and in case the petitioners are found entitled, benefit of the same shall be extended to the petitioners. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and therefore, the authority would be at liberty to examine the matter keeping all facts and facets into consideration and thereafter either accept or reject the representation by passing a reasoned order. With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C. as per rules. (Ms. Vandana Kasrekar) Judge manju  <object type="application/pdf" id="ggg_object" style="display: none"></object>  </div>

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Jwahar Lal Ahirwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2015

Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with the following directions :- i) Clause-3 of the policy dated 3.9.2005 fixing the cut off date 1.8.2003 to grant the benefit of second Krammonnati to the teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory, hence quashed. ii) Teachers of education Department or Tribal welfare Department are held entitled to get the benefit of Krammonnati under the policy dated 21.3.1983, 19.4.1999 and 2.11.2001 in accordance with the terms and conditions as specified therein. iii) In view of the said directions, if the orders of recovery passed by the Government against petitioners are quashed, and if any amount is recovered Prerna from them for said reasons be refunded back to them within three months with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, on failure to comply the said directions within the aforesaid time, the interest at the rate 9% per annum will be levyable. iv) In some of the cases the benefit of second Krammonnati has not been allowed to the petitioners, however on due consideration of their cases, the respondents are directed to do the needful in accordance with the policy dated 21.3.1983, 19.4.1999, 2.11.2001 and 3.9.2005 and settled their claim including post retiral and pensionary benefits within the period of six months from today and the arrears thereof be released along with permissible amount of interest under the law.%u201D It is observed that petitioners have directly approached this Court without filing any application before the authorities. In view of the aforesaid the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with the direction to the fact that in case the petitioners file representation before the authorities claiming the aforesaid benefit along with the copy of the order passed today and the copy of this petition, the concerned authority shall examine the same keeping in mind the order passed by this Court in the case of Smt. Prerna (supra) and by the Chhatisgarh High Court in the case of Om Prakash Sharma (supra) expeditiously in accordance with law and in case the petitioners are found entitled, benefit of the same shall be extended to the petitioners. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and therefore, the authority would be at liberty to examine the matter keeping all facts and facets into consideration and thereafter either accept or reject the representation by passing a reasoned order. With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C. as per rules. (Ms. Vandana Kasrekar) Judge manju  <object type="application/pdf" id="ggg_object" style="display: none"></object>  </div>

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Maipal Bele vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2015

Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with the following directions :- i) Clause-3 of the policy dated 3.9.2005 fixing the cut off date 1.8.2003 to grant the benefit of second Krammonnati to the teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory, hence quashed. ii) Teachers of education Department or Tribal welfare Department are held entitled to get the benefit of Krammonnati under the policy dated 21.3.1983, 19.4.1999 and 2.11.2001 in accordance with the terms and conditions as specified therein. iii) In view of the said directions, if the orders of recovery passed by the Government against petitioners are quashed, and if any amount is recovered Prerna from them for said reasons be refunded back to them within three months with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, on failure to comply the said directions within the aforesaid time, the interest at the rate 9% per annum will be levyable. iv) In some of the cases the benefit of second Krammonnati has not been allowed to the petitioners, however on due consideration of their cases, the respondents are directed to do the needful in accordance with the policy dated 21.3.1983, 19.4.1999, 2.11.2001 and 3.9.2005 and settled their claim including post retiral and pensionary benefits within the period of six months from today and the arrears thereof be released along with permissible amount of interest under the law.%u201D It is observed that petitioners have directly approached this Court without filing any application before the authorities. In view of the aforesaid the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with the direction to the fact that in case the petitioners file representation before the authorities claiming the aforesaid benefit along with the copy of the order passed today and the copy of this petition, the concerned authority shall examine the same keeping in mind the order passed by this Court in the case of Smt. Prerna (supra) and by the Chhatisgarh High Court in the case of Om Prakash Sharma (supra) expeditiously in accordance with law and in case the petitioners are found entitled, benefit of the same shall be extended to the petitioners. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and therefore, the authority would be at liberty to examine the matter keeping all facts and facets into consideration and thereafter either accept or reject the representation by passing a reasoned order. With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C. as per rules. (Ms. Vandana Kasrekar) Judge manju  <object type="application/pdf" id="ggg_object" style="display: none"></object>  </div>

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Haridutt Vaidhya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2015

Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with the following directions :- i) Clause-3 of the policy dated 3.9.2005 fixing the cut off date 1.8.2003 to grant the benefit of second Krammonnati to the teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory, hence quashed. ii) Teachers of education Department or Tribal welfare Department are held entitled to get the benefit of Krammonnati under the policy dated 21.3.1983, 19.4.1999 and 2.11.2001 in accordance with the terms and conditions as specified therein. iii) In view of the said directions, if the orders of recovery passed by the Government against petitioners are quashed, and if any amount is recovered Prerna from them for said reasons be refunded back to them within three months with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, on failure to comply the said directions within the aforesaid time, the interest at the rate 9% per annum will be levyable. iv) In some of the cases the benefit of second Krammonnati has not been allowed to the petitioners, however on due consideration of their cases, the respondents are directed to do the needful in accordance with the policy dated 21.3.1983, 19.4.1999, 2.11.2001 and 3.9.2005 and settled their claim including post retiral and pensionary benefits within the period of six months from today and the arrears thereof be released along with permissible amount of interest under the law.%u201D It is observed that petitioner has directly approached this Court without filing any application before the authorities. In view of the aforesaid the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with the direction to the fact that in case the petitioner file representation before the authorities claiming the aforesaid benefit along with the copy of the order passed today and the copy of this petition, the concerned authority shall examine the same keeping in mind the order passed by this Court in the case of Smt. Prerna (supra) and by the Chhatisgarh High Court in the case of Om Prakash Sharma (supra) expeditiously in accordance with law and in case the petitioner is found entitled, benefit of the same shall be extended to the petitioner. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and therefore, the authority would be at liberty to examine the matter keeping all facts and facets into consideration and thereafter either accept or reject the representation by passing a reasoned order. With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C. as per rules. (Ms. Vandana Kasrekar) Judge manju  <object type="application/pdf" id="ggg_object" style="display: none"></object>  </div>

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results