Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.47 seconds)
Documents citing Shree Satya Narain Tulsi Manas Mandir ... vs Workman Compensation ... on 26 May, 2006

Ajay Prakash Patel vs Prescribed Authority Cum Sub ... on 17 January, 2025

The law laid down by the Division Bench of this High Court in Satya Narayan versus Additional Commissioner, Ujjain & Others 2008 (1) M.P.LJ. 505 provided that the day on which the election was held to be excluded for computing the period of limitation. In that case, the election was held on January 29, 2005. The respondent No.2 was declared as elected member of the Jila Panchayat. An election petition was maintainable within a period of thirty days. The election petitioner filed election petition on February 28, 2005. As per the provisions of the General Clauses Act, 1957, the day on which the election was held on January 29, 2005 to be excluded for computing the period of limitation. The election petition had been filed within the period of limitation. Even otherwise, it is fairly informed by learned counsel for the parties that February 27, 2005 was a Sunday and the election petition had been filed on the next opening day i.e February 28, 2005, therefore, the election petition was treated to be within limitation.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs $ The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 22 September, 2021

Apart from this, the argument about Minimum Wages Act as advanced by the learned senior counsel has to be accepted. Learned senior counsel relying upon the definition in Section 3 of the Minimum Wages Act and the preamble argues that this Act will not apply to a Math at all. He also relies upon the order of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court of India which is filed as a material paper in Civil Appeal No.5305 of 2019. It was held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court that the Minimum Wages Act does not apply to a temple. The judgment of the Alhabad High Court from which the Civil Appeals were filed are also filed as material papers. They clearly show that the Minimum Wages Act applies only to certain industries and not to a temple. Subsequent judgment of the high Court of Allahabad reported in Shree Satya Narain Tulsi Manas Mandir v. Workman Compensation Commissioner3 in which proceedings which the order of the Supreme Court referred to are also filed as material papers.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1