Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 57 (4.11 seconds)
Documents citing Sandesh @ Sainath Kailash Abhang vs State Of Maharashtra on 13 December, 2012

Mithlesh Kumar Kushwaha vs State on 21 September, 2015

2014 (8) SCALE 113, Amar Singh Yadav v. State of U.P. (30 years sentence) and; (2013) 2 SCC 479, Sandesh @ Sainath Kailash Abhang v. State of Maharashtra (consecutive running of sentences). It is submitted that if this court is not inclined to impose the death penalty, certainly life sentence simplicitor is not an adequate sentence and the court must consider this other option. We shall examine this submission hereafter.‖
Delhi High Court Cites 134 - Cited by 0 - G Mittal - Full Document

Vishal Yadav vs State Govt. Of Up on 6 February, 2015

In this regard, reference is made to the pronouncements in (2012) 4 SCC 257, Ramnaresh v. State of Chhattisgarh (21 years sentence); (2002) 2 SCC 35, Prakash Dhawal Khairnar (Patil) v. State of Maharashtra (20 years sentence); 2014 (8) SCALE 113, Amar Singh Yadav v. State of U.P. (30 years sentence) and; (2013) 2 SCC 479, Sandesh @ Sainath Kailash Abhang v. State of Maharashtra (consecutive running of sentences). It is submitted that if this court is not inclined to impose the death penalty, certainly life sentence simplicitor is not an adequate sentence and the court must consider this other option. We shall examine this submission hereafter.
Delhi High Court Cites 370 - Cited by 2 - G Mittal - Full Document

The State Of Bihar vs Ajit Kumar on 20 October, 2020

[Section 366 of the Code; Sandesh v. State of Maharashtra (2013) 2 SCC 479, State of Punjab v. Dalbir Singh (2013) 3 SCC 346] IX. Principle of retribution: Capital punishment is based on the principle of denunciation of wrongdoing. It is a reflection of revulsion felt by society against crimes so outrageous that the wrongdoer gets 'punishment they deserve' - where life imprisonment is an inadequate punishment for the crime.
Patna High Court Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

Niranjan @ Alakh Deo Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 11 November, 2020

[Section 366 of the Code; Sandesh v. State of Maharashtra (2013) 2 SCC 479, State of Punjab v. Dalbir Singh (2013) 3 SCC 346] IX. Principle of retribution: Capital punishment is based on the principle of denunciation of wrong doing. It is a reflection of revulsion felt by society against crimes so outrageous that the wrongdoer gets 'punishment they deserve' - where life imprisonment is an inadequate punishment for the crime.
Patna High Court Cites 105 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

The State Of Bihar vs Niranjan @ Alakhdeo Kumar on 11 November, 2020

[Section 366 of the Code; Sandesh v. State of Maharashtra (2013) 2 SCC 479, State of Punjab v. Dalbir Singh (2013) 3 SCC 346] IX. Principle of retribution: Capital punishment is based on the principle of denunciation of wrong doing. It is a reflection of revulsion felt by society against crimes so outrageous that the wrongdoer gets 'punishment they deserve' - where life imprisonment is an inadequate punishment for the crime.
Patna High Court Cites 105 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next