Kesharsingh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 January, 2017
Respondents have filed their reply inter alia
contending that the engagement of the petitioner
is not in dispute but, because his services were not
regularized, therefore, he is not entitled to get the
pensionary benefits. It is said that the judgment of
Hari Narayan Sharma (supra) is distinguishable
from the facts of this case because the petitioner
was not regularized in the employment. However,
it is prayed that the petition filed by the petitioner
be dismissed.