citedby: 36960408

Ravindra Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of ... on 27 March, 2023

By the aforesaid order, the petitioner was granted the benefit of the order dated 02.07.2008 passed in Writ Petition No.3313 (S/S) of 1993 (Radhey Shyam Yadav vs. State of U.P. & Ors.). The operative part of the aforesaid order dated 02.07.2008 is also extracted below:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K S Pawar - Full Document

Hariram Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. ... on 14 November, 2024

He argues that merely institution of a case cannot be a ground for cancellation of the arms license as has been held by this Court in the case of Radhey Shyam Yadav v. State of U.P. & Ors.; 2019(2) ADJ 744 (LB); Laddan Khan v. Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow and Anr.; 2017(35) LCD 715 and Ghanshyam Gupta vs. State of U.P. & Ors.; 2016 (34) LCD 3035.

Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Rakesh Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar vs State Of U.P., Prin. Secy. Home Civil ... on 14 November, 2024

He argues that merely institution of a case cannot be a ground for cancellation of the arms license as has been held by this Court in the case of Radhey Shyam Yadav v. State of U.P. & Ors.; 2019(2) ADJ 744 (LB); Laddan Khan v. Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow and Anr.; 2017(35) LCD 715 and Ghanshyam Gupta vs. State of U.P. & Ors.; 2016 (34) LCD 3035.

Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Anil Kumar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 17 March, 2025

4. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that no complaint was lodged, no evidence has been collected against the petitioner and the criminal trial is still pending. He places reliance on the judgment of this court in Radhey Shyam Yadav v. State of U.P. & Ors.; 2019(2) ADJ 744 (LB); Laddan Khan v. Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow and Anr.; 2017(35) LCD 715 and Ghanshyam Gupta vs. State of U.P. & Ors.; 2016 (34) LCD 3035 to argue that there is no allegation of the petitioner having misuse the weapon in question. He further argues that even under section 504 IPC, the requirement is that there should intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace and no such allegation exists even in the FIR against the petitioner, as such, the cancellation of the arms license was wholly unjustified.

Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Radhey Shyam Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. ... on 4 July, 2022

Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length prays that he has already filed an application for correction in the earlier writ petition namely Misc. Single No. 27273 of 2021 Inre; Radhey Shyam Yadav Vs. State of U.P and Ors, as such the instant petition be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to pursue the said application.

Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Moin - Full Document

Arti Srivastava vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others on 15 October, 2025

In view of above, impugned order dated 27.06.2024 is set aside and matter is remitted back to pass a fresh order after taking note of order dated 16.06.1992 whereby petitioner was appointed and thereafter order dated 04.07.1995 whereby petitioner's appointment was approved as well as that at such belated stage when he has worked for more than 3 decades, any unnecessary objection would not be justified and while considering the matter afresh, concerned respondents will take note of judgment of Supreme Court in Radhey Shyam Yadav vs. State of U.P. and others, 2024 INSC 7 as well as retiral benefits of petitioner will also be settled.

Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S S Shamshery - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search