Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.32 seconds)

Hari Krishan vs State Of Punjab on 30 November, 2023

(iii) He further rests his argument on a judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case titled as Byram Pestonji Gariwala 5 of 12 ::: Downloaded on - 02-12-2023 23:08:47 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:153705-DB CWP-17394-1991 (O & M) -6- 2023:PHHC:153705-DB Vs. Union Bank of India, reported in 1991 (4) SC 15, whereins, it has been expostulated, that a consent decree constitutes resjudicata and is binding upon the parties. Moreover, when no limitation is prescribed in Section 37 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 or in any other provision thereof, for effecting a mutation in respect of the said compromise decree (supra).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S Thakur - Full Document

Dharampal Sharma Alias Dharampal And ... vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 19 March, 2024

28. The learned counsel has further relied upon a judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case titled as Bhagat Ram and 26 of 38 ::: Downloaded on - 21-03-2024 23:54:49 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:040501-DB CWP No. 854 of 2024 -27- 2024:PHHC:040501-DB others versus State of Punjab and others reported in (1967)2 SCR 165. The relevant paragraphs of the judgment (supra) are extracted hereinafter.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - S Thakur - Full Document

M/S Bhawani Castings Pvt. Ltd vs State Of Punjab And Others on 20 July, 2023

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 24-07-2023 23:32:40 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:091496-DB 2023:PHHC:091496-DB CWP-15288-2023 -2- Ltd. vs. The State of Punjab and another, decided on 21.12.2021 and CWP-13852-2021 titled as M/s. Raghunandan Iron & Steel Company vs. State of Punjab and another, decided on 28.07.2021 were disposed of by granting opportunity of hearing.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Bahri - Full Document
1