Hari Krishan vs State Of Punjab on 30 November, 2023
(iii) He further rests his argument on a judgment passed
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case titled as Byram Pestonji Gariwala
5 of 12
::: Downloaded on - 02-12-2023 23:08:47 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:153705-DB
CWP-17394-1991 (O & M) -6- 2023:PHHC:153705-DB
Vs. Union Bank of India, reported in 1991 (4) SC 15, whereins, it has
been expostulated, that a consent decree constitutes resjudicata and is
binding upon the parties. Moreover, when no limitation is prescribed in
Section 37 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 or in any other
provision thereof, for effecting a mutation in respect of the said
compromise decree (supra).