Motu @ Ashok vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 July, 2018
13. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Jodan Vs. State of
M.P., (2015) 11 SCC 52 has observed that evidence of
interested witness has to be examined carefully.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)Jaban Singh @ Jadon vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr on 27 January, 2016
This repeat bail application has been filed after rejection of
the earlier one on 14.10.2015 in shape of Mcrc No.10494/2015
which was rejected on merits. The new ground raised herein is the
recording of the statements of three eyewitnesses, namely, Hari
Singh, Basant Singh and Rinku Jadon who have been examined as
(PW-2), (PW-3) and (PW-4) on 15.12.2015, 16.12.2015 and
29.12.2015 respectively. They have turned hostile and did not
support the story of prosecution. There are no other eyewitnesses
2 Mcrc.13603.2015
Jaban Singh @ Jodan Vs. State of M.P.
except the once already examined. Moreover, co-accused
Veerendra Singh has also been benefited by granting bail by this
court vide dated 19.01.2016 in Mcrc No.13602/2015.
1