Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (1.20 seconds)
Documents citing Gurtej Singh vs Darbara Singh And Ors. on 3 February, 2000

Naib Singh vs Presiding Officer And Ors on 28 March, 2016

In case Gurtej Singh Vs. Darbara Singh (supra) the allegations were that earlier the election petitioner was declared elected by 16 votes. Thereafter, the electric light was switched off and respondent No.1 was declared elected. 72 votes were declared invalid in illegal and unlawful manner. It was observed by this Court that if the said 72 votes were found rejected illegally and without compliance of the provisions of Rule 33 of the Rules, the election petitioner could be declared a winning candidate. But in the instant case, as already mentioned as the petitioner has been declared elected by 193 votes and even if all the 43 cancelled/rejected votes are counted in favour of the election petitioner, the result will remain the same.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anup Singh vs Daler Singh And Ors on 16 September, 2015

In view of the aforementioned facts of the case. I have arrived at the conclusion that before giving issue-wise finding, the re-counting of votes will be in the interest of justice. However, this finding/ observation of mine will not have any bearing on the merits while giving final decision of the present petition. The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court has opinioned in CR No.39 of 2000 titled as Gurtej Singh versus Darbara Singh that to do finally complete justice between the parties and to avoid unnecessary prolongation of petition order of recount is an effective and expeditious solution to the election petition."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - K Singh - Full Document

Bohar Singh vs Presiding Officer Election Tribunal ... on 25 June, 2018

10 of 12 ::: Downloaded on - 26-06-2018 00:35:48 ::: FAO No.6139 of 2015 (O&M) -11- Counsel for respondent No.2 has relied upon Gurtej Singh Vs. Darbara Singh, 2000 (2) RCR (Civil) 525 to argue that in that case this Court after considering the judgment in P.K.K.Shamsudeen's case supra had allowed recount. Counsel for the appellant however points out that in that case this Court had noticed that the Presiding Officer had passed a detailed speaking order ordering recount.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1