Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (1.17 seconds)
Documents citing Suman vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 13 November, 2009

Suman vs . The State & Anr. on 14 January, 2019

10. With the above said proposition of law, I would like to advert to the facts of the present case. It may be noted that respondent no. 2 appeared as CW-2 and inter-alia reiterated her version as given in the complaint. While appearing as CW-2 respondent no. 2 has testified that on 29.01.2015 she received a call from her father that he was not feeling well and, therefore, on Page 7 of 10 CR No. 336/18 Suman Vs. The State & Anr.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hardeep Singh vs State Of Punjab . on 10 January, 2014

In Suman v. State of Rajasthan & Anr., AIR 2010 SC 518, a two- Judge Bench of this Court observed that there is nothing in the language of this sub-section from which it can be inferred that a person who is named in the FIR or complaint, but against whom charge- sheet is not filed by the police, cannot be proceeded against even though in the course of any inquiry into or trial of any offence, the court finds that such person has committed an offence for which he could be tried together with the other accused.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 113 - Cited by 0 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Tabbussum Zahera vs State Of Karnataka on 28 July, 2021

In Suman v. State of Rajasthan & Anr., AIR 2010 SC 518, a two-Judge Bench of this Court observed that there is nothing in the language of this sub-section from which it can be inferred that a person who is named in the FIR or complaint, but against whom charge- sheet is not filed by the police, cannot be proceeded against even though in the course of any inquiry into or trial of any offence, the court finds that such person has committed an offence for which he could be tried together with the other accused.
Karnataka High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - K Natarajan - Full Document

Smt. Suman vs State Of U.P. And Another on 13 December, 2021

In Suman v. State of Rajasthan & Anr., AIR 2010 SC 518, a two- Judge Bench of this Court observed that there is nothing in the language of this sub-section from which it can be inferred that a person who is named in the FIR or complaint, but against whom charge- sheet is not filed by the police, cannot be proceeded against even though in the course of any inquiry into or trial of any offence, the court finds that such person has committed an offence for which he could be tried together with the other accused.
Allahabad High Court Cites 85 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Munni Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 4 December, 2021

In Suman v. State of Rajasthan & Anr., AIR 2010 SC 518, a two- Judge Bench of this Court observed that there is nothing in the language of this sub-section from which it can be inferred that a person who is named in the FIR or complaint, but against whom charge- sheet is not filed by the police, cannot be proceeded against even though in the course of any inquiry into or trial of any offence, the court finds that such person has committed an offence for which he could be tried together with the other accused.
Allahabad High Court Cites 90 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Raju Alias Rajesh Kumar vs State Of U.P. And Another on 25 November, 2021

In Suman v. State of Rajasthan & Anr., AIR 2010 SC 518, a two- Judge Bench of this Court observed that there is nothing in the language of this sub-section from which it can be inferred that a person who is named in the FIR or complaint, but against whom charge- sheet is not filed by the police, cannot be proceeded against even though in the course of any inquiry into or trial of any offence, the court finds that such person has committed an offence for which he could be tried together with the other accused.
Allahabad High Court Cites 86 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Girish Kumar @ Bobby vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 June, 2022

In Suman v. State of Rajasthan & Anr., AIR 2010 SC 518, a two- Judge Bench of this Court observed that there is nothing in the language of this sub-section from which it can be inferred that a person who is named in the FIR or complaint, but against whom charge- sheet is not filed by the police, cannot be proceeded against even though in the course of any inquiry into or trial of any offence, the court finds that such person has committed an offence for which he could be tried together with the other accused.
Allahabad High Court Cites 88 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Rameshwar And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 June, 2022

In Suman v. State of Rajasthan & Anr., AIR 2010 SC 518, a two- Judge Bench of this Court observed that there is nothing in the language of this sub-section from which it can be inferred that a person who is named in the FIR or complaint, but against whom charge- sheet is not filed by the police, cannot be proceeded against even though in the course of any inquiry into or trial of any offence, the court finds that such person has committed an offence for which he could be tried together with the other accused.
Allahabad High Court Cites 84 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sumit vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 June, 2022

In Suman v. State of Rajasthan & Anr., AIR 2010 SC 518, a two- Judge Bench of this Court observed that there is nothing in the language of this sub-section from which it can be inferred that a person who is named in the FIR or complaint, but against whom charge- sheet is not filed by the police, cannot be proceeded against even though in the course of any inquiry into or trial of any offence, the court finds that such person has committed an offence for which he could be tried together with the other accused.
Allahabad High Court Cites 83 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next