citedby: 4371269

Sunil Kumar Vishwakarma vs State Of U.P. And Another on 13 August, 2025

4. Till the disposal of the said proceedings, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant with respect to the Complaint Case No. 756 of 2020 (Amit Pandey Vs. Sunil Kumar Vishwakarma) u/s 138 N.I. Act. Police Station Kotwali, District, Allahabad, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No. 10, Allahabad.

Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Meera vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 July, 2021

The Supreme Court in the case of Pratibha Vs. Rameshwari Bai reported in (2007) 12 SCC 369 has held as under :

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Sangeeta Bhadauria vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 November, 2021

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT GWALIOR M.Cr.C. No. 44175/2021 ( Sangeeta Bhadoriya Vs The State of MP. & another ) (19) The Supreme Court in the case of Pratibha Vs. Rameshwari Bai reported in (2007) 12 SCC 369 has held as under :

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 56 - Cited by 1 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Rajbohar Kushwaha vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 9 December, 2021

The Supreme Court in the case of Pratibha Vs. Rameshwari Bai reported in (2007) 12 SCC 369 has held as under :

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Dharmender Kumar vs State on 7 July, 2022

1. The present is a judicial verdict, passed in revision petition, preferred by Dharmendra Kumar (hereinafter referred to as revisionist), against the impugned order, dated 19.01.2022, passed by the court of Sh. Arun Kumar Garg, the then ld. CMM, NorthEast District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in case titled as "Pratibha Vs. Sanjeev Tomar @ Sanjeev Kumar", CT cases no.733/2019, PS Gokalpuri, whereby, the ld.Trial Court, directed issuance of warrant of attachment of the salary of the revisionist, to the extent of his basic pay for the month of January, 2022, in the name of Drawing and Disbursing Officer, NorthEast District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, on account of alleged dereliction of duties, on the part of the revisionist.

Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pratibha Pandey And Another vs Sindhu Dubey And Another on 25 June, 2020

The petitioners have approached this Court to expedite the application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the C.P.C. pending in Original Suit No. 371 of 2020 (Smt. Pratibha Panday & another vs. Smt. Sindhu Dubey and another) before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Nagar.

Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Smt. Divya Sachar vs State, Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 24 December, 2025

b.) Quash the Complaint dated 25.04.2016 filed by Respondent No.2 and all consequential proceedings arising out of the Complaint case titled "Pawan Kumar Pandey vs. Divya Sachar" in so far as they relate to the Petitioner / accused; c.)

Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Bhagwati Pandey vs Sunil Yadav on 11 October, 2018

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pratibha Agarwal vs Anil Singh And 2 Others on 21 January, 2021

The Present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Khafifa Judge, Jhansi to consider and decide the Original Suit Old No. 437 of 2013 New No. 22 of 2018 (Smt. Pratibha Agarwal & Others Vs. Anil Singh & Others) expeditiously and preferably within stipulated period.

Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document

Pratima Pandey vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 December, 2022

By the present petition, petitioner is praying for expeditious disposal of Divorce Petition No. 164 of 2022 (Pratima Pandey Vs. Ajay Kumar Pandey) pending in the Court of Principal Family Court, Maharajganj, within stipulate period.

Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Chaudhary - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results