Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.76 seconds)
Documents citing Govt. School Teachers Association ... vs Union Of India And Ors. on 18 May, 2015

Promila Sejwal vs Govt. Of Nctd on 30 March, 2016

But, even the judgments in the case of Preeti Rathi (supra), and in Govt. School Teachers Association (Migrants) Regd. & others v. Union of India & others (supra), did not relate to any weightage being accorded for working in contract capacity, and related only to the aspect of age relaxation for period of contractual employment at the time of undertaking process for selection as Assistant Teachers (Nursery).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Kumar Anand vs Union Of India & Ors. on 20 September, 2017

Having considered the order of the Tribunal in the Government School Teachers Association (supra), we find that the said decision of the Tribunal does not at all deal with the interpretation of Rules and, in fact, the said case had been dismissed only because the Applicant therein being a Teacher Association, was seeking parity with Assistant/Steno Cadre-which parity could not be established and, therefore, we find no justification for relying on the said order to reject the Petitioner's claim, which we find is fully justified and in consonance with the Rules.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - R Palli - Full Document

Samina Zubair vs New Delhi Municipal Corporation on 30 September, 2022

2. The applicant has been working as Teacher for the last two decades in the Respondent department and seeking regularization by making representation dated 22.10.2020 (Annexure A-1 Colly). Learned counsel for the applicant has also drawn our attention to the judgment passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of Govt. School Teachers' Association Vs. Union of India & Ors. dated 18.05.2015 and the Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of State of Karnakata Vs. Uma Devi, 2006 (4) SCC 1 has also been discussed.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Radhey Shyam vs M/O Health And Family Welfare on 14 October, 2015

Though the prayer made in the present Original Applications is to quash the interview conducted by respondent No.2 for appointment to the post of Junior ECG Technician and for issuance of direction to the respondents, particularly respondent No.2, to grant promotion to the applicants on parity basis, during the course of arguments, Mr. Anil Singal, 2 learned counsel for applicants submitted that he would be contented if the Original Applications are disposed of with direction to the respondents to examine the claims of the applicants for appointment to the post in question against available / future vacancies, in view of the judgments of Hon'ble High Court in S.K. Chaudhary & others v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & another (W.P. (C) No.14160/2009) dated 9.1.2013 and Govt. School Teachers Association (Migrants) Regd. & others v. Union of India & others (W.P. (C) No.3989/2010) dated 18.5.2015 as also the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka & others v. M.L. Kesari & others, AIR 2010 SC 2587 and Nihal Singh & another v. State of Punjab & others (2013) 14 SCC 65.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1