Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 85 (1.15 seconds)
Documents citing Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 February, 2020

Vengalrao Nagar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 April, 2024

Recently, in the case of Papatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in (2020) SCC Online SC 291 it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that State and its instrumentality should act as a model litigant and should not put forth false, frivolous, vexatious, technical (unjust) contention to obstruct patch of justice and by taking technical plea for the purpose of defeating legitimate claim of citizen and should do what is fair and just for the citizen. 16. In view of the aforesaid discussion and the settled proposition of law we are of the considered opinion that the respondents were not justified in withholding the amount of GST impact and the same is arbitrary, violative and against their own terms of agreement. Consequently, we hold that in view of introduction 32 W.P.(T) No. 6712 of 2023 & batch cases of GST during the continuance of the ongoing contract, the liability to pay GST shall be that of the Respondent JBVNL in terms of the amended work order incorporating the impact of GST.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document

Vengalrao Nagar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 April, 2024

Recently, in the case of Papatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in (2020) SCC Online SC 291 it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that State and its instrumentality should act as a model litigant and should not put forth false, frivolous, vexatious, technical (unjust) contention to obstruct patch of justice and by taking technical plea for the purpose of defeating legitimate claim of citizen and should do what is fair and just for the citizen. 16. In view of the aforesaid discussion and the settled proposition of law we are of the considered opinion that the respondents were not justified in withholding the amount of GST impact and the same is arbitrary, violative and against their own terms of agreement. Consequently, we hold that in view of introduction 32 W.P.(T) No. 6712 of 2023 & batch cases of GST during the continuance of the ongoing contract, the liability to pay GST shall be that of the Respondent JBVNL in terms of the amended work order incorporating the impact of GST.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document

Vengalrao Nagar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 April, 2024

Recently, in the case of Papatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in (2020) SCC Online SC 291 it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that State and its instrumentality should act as a model litigant and should not put forth false, frivolous, vexatious, technical (unjust) contention to obstruct patch of justice and by taking technical plea for the purpose of defeating legitimate claim of citizen and should do what is fair and just for the citizen. 16. In view of the aforesaid discussion and the settled proposition of law we are of the considered opinion that the respondents were not justified in withholding the amount of GST impact and the same is arbitrary, violative and against their own terms of agreement. Consequently, we hold that in view of introduction 32 W.P.(T) No. 6712 of 2023 & batch cases of GST during the continuance of the ongoing contract, the liability to pay GST shall be that of the Respondent JBVNL in terms of the amended work order incorporating the impact of GST.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document

Vengalrao Nagar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 April, 2024

Recently, in the case of Papatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in (2020) SCC Online SC 291 it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that State and its instrumentality should act as a model litigant and should not put forth false, frivolous, vexatious, technical (unjust) contention to obstruct patch of justice and by taking technical plea for the purpose of defeating legitimate claim of citizen and should do what is fair and just for the citizen. 16. In view of the aforesaid discussion and the settled proposition of law we are of the considered opinion that the respondents were not justified in withholding the amount of GST impact and the same is arbitrary, violative and against their own terms of agreement. Consequently, we hold that in view of introduction 32 W.P.(T) No. 6712 of 2023 & batch cases of GST during the continuance of the ongoing contract, the liability to pay GST shall be that of the Respondent JBVNL in terms of the amended work order incorporating the impact of GST.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document

Vengalrao Nagar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 April, 2024

Recently, in the case of Papatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in (2020) SCC Online SC 291 it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that State and its instrumentality should act as a model litigant and should not put forth false, frivolous, vexatious, technical (unjust) contention to obstruct patch of justice and by taking technical plea for the purpose of defeating legitimate claim of citizen and should do what is fair and just for the citizen. 16. In view of the aforesaid discussion and the settled proposition of law we are of the considered opinion that the respondents were not justified in withholding the amount of GST impact and the same is arbitrary, violative and against their own terms of agreement. Consequently, we hold that in view of introduction 32 W.P.(T) No. 6712 of 2023 & batch cases of GST during the continuance of the ongoing contract, the liability to pay GST shall be that of the Respondent JBVNL in terms of the amended work order incorporating the impact of GST.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document

Vengalrao Nagar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 April, 2024

Recently, in the case of Papatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in (2020) SCC Online SC 291 it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that State and its instrumentality should act as a model litigant and should not put forth false, frivolous, vexatious, technical (unjust) contention to obstruct patch of justice and by taking technical plea for the purpose of defeating legitimate claim of citizen and should do what is fair and just for the citizen. 16. In view of the aforesaid discussion and the settled proposition of law we are of the considered opinion that the respondents were not justified in withholding the amount of GST impact and the same is arbitrary, violative and against their own terms of agreement. Consequently, we hold that in view of introduction 32 W.P.(T) No. 6712 of 2023 & batch cases of GST during the continuance of the ongoing contract, the liability to pay GST shall be that of the Respondent JBVNL in terms of the amended work order incorporating the impact of GST.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document

Vengalrao Nagar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 April, 2024

Recently, in the case of Papatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in (2020) SCC Online SC 291 it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that State and its instrumentality should act as a model litigant and should not put forth false, frivolous, vexatious, technical (unjust) contention to obstruct patch of justice and by taking technical plea for the purpose of defeating legitimate claim of citizen and should do what is fair and just for the citizen. 16. In view of the aforesaid discussion and the settled proposition of law we are of the considered opinion that the respondents were not justified in withholding the amount of GST impact and the same is arbitrary, violative and against their own terms of agreement. Consequently, we hold that in view of introduction 32 W.P.(T) No. 6712 of 2023 & batch cases of GST during the continuance of the ongoing contract, the liability to pay GST shall be that of the Respondent JBVNL in terms of the amended work order incorporating the impact of GST.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document

Vengalrao Nagar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 April, 2024

Recently, in the case of Papatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in (2020) SCC Online SC 291 it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that State and its instrumentality should act as a model litigant and should not put forth false, frivolous, vexatious, technical (unjust) contention to obstruct patch of justice and by taking technical plea for the purpose of defeating legitimate claim of citizen and should do what is fair and just for the citizen. 16. In view of the aforesaid discussion and the settled proposition of law we are of the considered opinion that the respondents were not justified in withholding the amount of GST impact and the same is arbitrary, violative and against their own terms of agreement. Consequently, we hold that in view of introduction 32 W.P.(T) No. 6712 of 2023 & batch cases of GST during the continuance of the ongoing contract, the liability to pay GST shall be that of the Respondent JBVNL in terms of the amended work order incorporating the impact of GST.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document

Vengalrao Nagar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 9 April, 2024

Recently, in the case of Papatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in (2020) SCC Online SC 291 it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that State and its instrumentality should act as a model litigant and should not put forth false, frivolous, vexatious, technical (unjust) contention to obstruct patch of justice and by taking technical plea for the purpose of defeating legitimate claim of citizen and should do what is fair and just for the citizen. 16. In view of the aforesaid discussion and the settled proposition of law we are of the considered opinion that the respondents were not justified in withholding the amount of GST impact and the same is arbitrary, violative and against their own terms of agreement. Consequently, we hold that in view of introduction 32 W.P.(T) No. 6712 of 2023 & batch cases of GST during the continuance of the ongoing contract, the liability to pay GST shall be that of the Respondent JBVNL in terms of the amended work order incorporating the impact of GST.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next