Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)

Manisha Chawla vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 4 February, 2022

In the case of Jagjit Singh Vs Ravinder Kaur II(2004) DMC 599( J&K) the wife had claimed that various dowry articles had been given to her at the time of marriage and that she was not treated well by the accused persons i.e. her husband and family members after her marriage and they made dowry demands and finally she was turned out of her matrimonial RAVINDER Digitally signed by RAVINDER BEDI BEDI Date: 2022.02.04 ____________________________________________________________________ 16:51:33 +0530 CR No.60/2020 Manisha Chawla Vs. State and ors. Page 8 of 9 9 home without her dowry articles being returned to her. It was observed that these averments in itself were not sufficient to constitute an offence under Section 406 IPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanghmitra vs State Page No. 1 on 1 October, 2012

18. Similar facts as under consideration in the present case arose for consideration in the case of Jagjit Singh Vs Ravinder Kaur II(2004) DMC 599( J&K) wherein also the wife had claimed that various dowry articles had been given to her at the time of marriage and that she was not treated well by the accused persons i.e. her husband and family members after her marriage and they made dowry demands and finally she was turned out of her matrimonial home without her dowry articles being returned to her. It was observed that these averments in itself were not sufficient to constitute an offence under Section 406 IPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1