Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.41 seconds)

Arun Kumar vs Rohit Bal Designs Pvt Ltd on 4 September, 2024

2.4 As per plaintiff, he was performing his duties with utmost efficiency, honesty and diligence. There had not been a single and solitary action, wherein there had been a dereliction of his duties. Over the period, plaintiff's salary has been enhanced by defendant company due to his exemplary performance. The last in hand drawn salary of the plaintiff was Rs.47,500/-. 2.5 Plaintiff stated that he has been in continuous CS (COMM.) No.617/2021 (Arun Kumar vs. Rohit Bal Designs Pvt. Ltd. & Others) Page No. 3 of 22 employment of defendant since 13.08.2014 but defendants unceremoniously and abruptly removed him on 27.03.2019 contrary to the terms of employment without assigning any reasons.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arun Kumar Gupta vs Archna Singh on 22 January, 2021

7. It is stated that in view of the acts and conduct of the defendant, the defendant has now got no right to use and occupy the suit Suit no. 934/19 Arun Kumar Gupta Vs. Archana Singh 4/9 property any more, therefore, the defendant is liable to hand over the peaceful vacant possession of the suit property to the plaintiff. It is further submitted that till the defendant hands over the possession of the suit property, is also to pay the said amount of Rs. 79,500/­ per month that too month by month to the plaintiff and even during the pendency of the present suit. It is further relevant to mention that since 01.07.2019 the defendant has not paid any amount to the plaintiff and whereas the defendant is still in use, occupation and possession of the suit property.
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jitendra And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 26 May, 2022

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the impugned order dated 18.03.2021 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No.3, Meerut, in Case No. 714 of 2020 'Arun Kumar Vs. Komal and Others' arising out of Case Crime No. 543 of 2018, under Sections 307, 120B I.P.C., Police Station- Parikshitgarh, District- Meerut. Further prayer to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case has also been made.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - U Kumar - Full Document

Vijay Kumar Agarwal vs State Of U.P.And Another on 7 February, 2020

The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to quash the order dated 5.11.2018 passed by the learned Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Bijnor in F.R. No.12 of 2008, Arun KUmar Vs. Vijay Kumar Agarwal arising out of case crime no.871 of 2006, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, P.S. Kiratpur, District Bijnor in respect of rejecting final report and directing for further investigation against the accused persons.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - N A Moonis - Full Document

Arun Kumar vs Smt. Archana on 19 December, 2022

This appeal has been filed by the appellant praying to set aside the judgment and order dated 15.11.2022 in Case No. 399 of 2017 (Arun Kumar Vs. Archana), passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court No.1, Etawah, whereby the application 18-Ka under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the defendant-respondent, has been partly allowed directing the plaintiff-appellant to pay Rs. 3000/- per month to the defendant-respondent towards interim maintenance of the defendant-respondent and two children. Apart from above, Rs. 4,000/- has been directed to be paid towards the legal expenses.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S P Kesarwani - Full Document
1   2 Next