Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (1.11 seconds)
Documents citing Jai Bharath College Of Management And ... vs The State Of Kerala on 8 September, 2020

Ilahia Trust vs A.P.J Abdul Kalam Technological ... on 11 September, 2020

In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent Vice-Chancellor to take an appropriate decision on Ext.P5 application made by the petitioner, insofar as affiliation for the new course in "B.Tech - Artificial Intelligence and Data Sciences" for the academic year 2020-21 is concerned, in exercise of his powers under sub-section (6) of Section 14 of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University Act, 2015, taking note of the law laid down by the Division Bench in the decision referred to supra, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate on or before 15.09.2020.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

V.Lekha vs The Chairman on 19 August, 2021

40 In regard to the submission of legislative competence, the http://www.judis.nic.in 109 WP.Nos.19534/2018 etc., batch learned counsel would elaborate that though the education is a subject included in the Concurrent List, a specific entry is made [Entry 66] in the Union List under Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. The same alone will prevail in terms of the scheme of the Constitution, by applying Doctrine of Pith and Substance. The prescription of different qualifications is therefore are contrary to the qualifications laid down by the BCI. Any action taken not in terms of Entry 66, tracing the power to Section 7[1][h] of the Advocates' Act, 1961, has to be necessarily declared as unconstitutional, illegal as they repugnant to the Central legislation.
Madras High Court Cites 114 - Cited by 0 - N Kirubakaran - Full Document

V.Lekha vs The Chairman on 19 August, 2021

40 In regard to the submission of legislative competence, the learned counsel would elaborate that though the education is a subject included in the Concurrent List, a specific entry is made [Entry 66] in the Union List under Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. The same alone will prevail in terms of the scheme of the Constitution, by applying Doctrine of Pith and Substance. The prescription of different https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 107 WP.Nos.19534/2018 etc., batch qualifications is therefore are contrary to the qualifications laid down by the BCI. Any action taken not in terms of Entry 66, tracing the power to Section 7[1][h] of the Advocates' Act, 1961, has to be necessarily declared as unconstitutional, illegal as they repugnant to the Central legislation.
Madras High Court Cites 113 - Cited by 0 - N Kirubakaran - Full Document

Mangalam College Of Engineering vs Apj Abdul Kalam Technological ... on 11 September, 2020

In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Vice-Chancellor of the 1st respondent University to reconsider the request made by the petitioner for affiliation to MBA course with an annual intake of 120, for the academic year 2020-21, in terms of Ext.P7 approval granted by AICTE, in exercise of his powers under sub-section (6) of Section 14 of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University Act, 2015, taking note of the law laid down by the Division Bench in the decision referred to supra, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate on or before 15.09.2020.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Indira Charitable Trust vs State Of Kerala on 11 September, 2020

In the result, this writ petition is disposed of by setting -9- W.P.(C). No. 18264 of 2020 aside Ext.P3 order dated 21.08.2020 of the 2 nd respondent to the above extent and by directing respondents 2 and 3 to reconsider the request made by the petitioner for grant of approval/affiliation to Diploma in Automobile Engineer in its college for the academic year 2020-21, with an annual intake of 60, in terms of the approval granted by the AICTE in Ext.P2, taking note of the law laid down in this judgment, and take an appropriate decision, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, on or before 15.09.2020.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Jai Bharath College Of Management And ... vs State Of Kerala on 14 September, 2020

In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondents 2 and 3 to consider the application for approval/affiliation to the Diploma Courses in Automobile Engineering and Architecture Engineering in the petitioner College for the academic year 2020-21, in terms of the approval granted by the 5th respondent AICTE in Ext.P2 and take an appropriate decision, taking note of the law laid down by this Court in W.P(C).No.18264 of 2020, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, on or before 15.09.2020.
Kerala High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Holy Grace Foundation vs State Of Kerala on 14 September, 2020

In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondents 2 and 3 to consider the application made by the petitioner for approval/affiliation to the Diploma Course in Automobile Engineering in the petitioner's College for the academic year 2020-21, in terms of the approval granted by the 5th respondent AICTE in Ext.P6 and take an appropriate decision, taking note of the law laid down by this Court in W.P(C).No.18264 of 2020, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, on or before 15.09.2020.
Kerala High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Ilahia Trust vs Dr.Rajasree M.S on 7 October, 2020

for the academic year 2020-21 is concerned, in exercise of his powers under sub-section (6) of Section 14 of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University Act, 2015, taking note of the law laid down by the Division Bench in Jai Bharath College of Management and Engineering Technology v. State of Kerala and others [Judgment dated 08.09.2020 in W.A.No.1073 of 2020 and connected cases], as expeditiously as possible, at any rate on or before 15.09.2020.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document
1