Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (2.64 seconds)Documents citing
Ms. Taposhi Chakervarti vs State on 5 September, 2000
State vs Accused on 16 November, 2012
69. Sixteenthly, the principles of law laid down in
cases, Wazir Chand v. State of Haryana, (supra), Sohan Raj
Sharma v. State of Haryana, (supra), Prashant Manchanda
v. Ltd. Governor of Delhi & Anr., (supra) and Ms. Taposhi
Chakervarti v. State, (supra), support the prosecution case.
Ajit Singh vs State (Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi) on 24 November, 2009
11. Reliance has also been placed upon Taposhi Chakervarti Vs.
State 2000 VII AD (Delhi) 629. It is submitted that a Coordinate
Bench of this court had held that in the absence of evidence of the
abettor shown to have intentionally aided the commissioning of
the crime and mere proof that the crime could not have been
committed without the interposition of the alleged abettor is not
enough compliance with the requirements of Section 107 of the
IPC; active complicity is the gist of the offence of abetment.
2013(3) Rcr (Criminal) 924 Titled As ... vs . State Of on 11 December, 2013
In support of his contentions, learned defence counsel has relied upon
2000 VII AD (Delhi) 629 titled as Ms. Taposhi Chakervarti Vs. State, wherein it
has been held that:
State vs . (1) Rakesh Sharma on 14 January, 2011
L.J 2723 ; Sunil Bajaj Vs. State of M.P AIR 2001 SC 3020;
Emperor Vs. Parimal Chatterjee and others AIR 1932 Calcutta
SC No. 65/2008 Page 9/25
-:10:-
760; State of Bihar Vs. Ranen Nath and others, AIR 1938 Patna
259 (V 45 C 96) ; Shri Ram Vs. The U.P, Sai Ram and another
Vs. State of U.P, AIR 1975 SC, 175 ; Gurdip Kumar and others
Vs. the State of Punjab, 1981 CRI L.J NoC 178 ; Brij Lal and
Anr. Vs. State 1985, C.C Cases HC 130 ; Gurcharan Singh Vs.
State 1983 C.C Cases 350 (HC) ; Ms. Taposhi Chakervarti Vs.
State, 2000(2) JCC 466 (Delhi) ; Laxmi & Anr Vs. State 2000 (2)
JCC (Delhi) 297 ; Maulaali Yakub Jamadar & Ors. Vs. State of
Maharashtra IV (2000) CCR 624 Bombay High Court ; Alka
Grewal Vs. State of M.P, 2000 CRI.L.J 672 ; Pallem Deniel
Victor @ Victor Hanter and Others Vs. State of A.P 1997 (1)
Crimes 499 ; Manish Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan,
1995 CRI L.J 3066 ; C. Nehru Baby Vs. State of A.P, 2002(1)
C.C Cases (H.C) 300 ; Ahshan Khan Vs. State of Madhya
Pradesh, 2002 91) Crimes 117 ; Pradeep S. Ahluwalia Vs. The
State, 1999 (2) C.C Cases HC 414 ; K. Ravi Kumar Vs. State and
Anr. 2008 (1) Crimes 345 (Mad.)
State vs Parmeet Singh Narula on 20 February, 2010
(ii) Taposi Chakervarti Vs. State : II (2000) DMC 558
State vs . Guddu Chaudhary on 22 February, 2008
In 2002 (2) JCC 466 (Delhi), "Ms. Taposhi Chakervarti
Vs. State" while dealing with case relating to Sec. 306/498A IPC, it
was observed by our Hon'ble Delhi High Court in para - 6 as under :-
St. vs . Lala Ram & Ors. on 11 April, 2008
In 2002 (2) JCC 466 (Delhi), "Ms. Taposhi
Chakervarti Vs. State" while dealing with case relating to
Sec. 306/498A IPC, it was observed by our Hon'ble Delhi
High Court in para - 6 as under :-
St. vs . Pawan Kumar & Anr. on 22 October, 2007
In 2002 (2) JCC 466 (Delhi), "Ms. Taposhi
Chakervarti Vs. State" while dealing with case relating
to Sec. 306/498A IPC, it was observed by our Hon'ble
Delhi High Court in para - 6 as under :-
St. vs . Hukum Singh & Ors. on 14 November, 2007
In 2002 (2) JCC 466 (Delhi), "Ms. Taposhi
Chakervarti Vs. State" while dealing with case relating to Sec.
306/498A IPC, it was observed by our Hon'ble Delhi High Court in
para - 6 as under :-