citedby: 47602

Common Cause (A Regd. Society) vs Union Of India And Others on 11 April, 2008

The judiciary must know its limits and exercise judicial restraint vide Divisional Manager, Aravali Golf Course & Anr. vs. Chander Hass, JT 2008(3) SC 221. The people must also realize that the judiciary has its limits and cannot solve all their problems, despite its best intentions.

Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 32 - M Katju - Full Document

Bharath Kumar V vs Social Justice And Empowerment on 7 January, 2025

In Divisional Manager, Aravali Golf Club and Another Vs. Chander Hass and Another, Civil Appeal no.5732/2007, the Hon‟ble Apex Court has held that the Judges must exercise judicial restraint and must not encroach into the executive or legislative domain.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Satya Narain Shukla ,I.A.S.(Retd), ... vs State Of U.P. Chief Secy. Sachivalaya ... on 29 May, 2015

In Divisional Manager, Aravali Golf Club and another Vs. Chander Hass and another24 the Hon'ble Supreme Court has discussed again the same situation and expressed the opinion in para 31:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - N Shukla - Full Document

Petroleum Employees' Union vs The Management Of Oil & Natural

26. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/ONGC also placed reliance upon the decision in International Airport Authority of India and International Air Cargo Workers' Union and Another [2009 LLR 923], which dealt with the issue relating to non-absorption of workmen and would submit that in the above said decision, it was held that the workmen therein are not entitled to absorption as they were regular employees of Air Freight and that IAAI had no obligation to absorb or employ them and admittedly the workers were contract employees of the respondent/ONGC and on formation of the Society, being members of the Society, continue to work as Messengers and Sanitary Workers etc., and as such, they are not entitled for regularization.

Madras High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document

R.Vijayakumar vs Government Of Tamil Nadu on 6 February, 2013

9. As has been held by this Court in Aravali Golf Club v. Chander Hass13 and in Govt. of A.P. v. P. Laxmi Devi14 the court must maintain judicial restraint in matters relating to the legislative or executive domain. (emphasis supplied)

Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 8 - K Chandru - Full Document

Anoop Baranwal vs Union Of India Ministry Of Law And ... on 2 March, 2023

We also take notice of the following words of this Court in Divisional Manager, Aravali Golf Club and Another v. Chander Hass and Another,27 where the merit of exercising judicial restraint has been emphasized.

Supreme Court of India Cites 270 - Cited by 6 - K Joseph - Full Document

C.Sadeswari vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 4 July, 2022

9. As has been held by this Court in Aravali Golf Club vs. Chander Hass, 2008(1) SCC 683 and in Govt. of A.P. vs. P. Laxmi Devi, 2008 (4) SCC 720, the court must maintain judicial restraint in matters relating to the legislative or executive domain."

Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

D.A.Ramakrishnan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 18 January, 2018

9. As has been held by this Court in Aravali Golf Club vs. Chander Hass, 2008(1) SCC 683 and in Govt. of A.P. vs. P. Laxmi Devi, 2008 (4) SCC 720, the court must maintain judicial restraint in matters relating to the legislative or executive domain."

Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

The Management Of Madras vs The Deputy Chief Inspector Of Factories on 29 January, 2018

(iii) Divisional Manager, Aravali Golf Club and Another v. Chander Hass and Another [(2008) 1 SCC 683]

Madras High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document

Shanmugam vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 19 September, 2011

5......There is no statutory rule. ....... Thus, the High Court has indulged in judicial legislation, which is not ordinarily permissible to the Courts vide Aravali Golf Club v. Chander Hass1. Also, none of these colleges were made parties before the High Court, and hence the aforesaid direction is violative of the principles of natural justice."

Madras High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 1 - K Chandru - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results