Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Mahendra Singh @ Ujagar Patel vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 12 November, 2014

Bunty @ Sudeep Choudhary vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 December, 2014

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case including the gravity of offence, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I am of the view that the order passed by the Single Bench of this Court in the case of Ujagar Singh (supra) is an order on the set of particular fact and the same cannot be considered as a precedent in each and every case, otherwise a person shall remain absent during the trial of other co-accused persons and he would terrorize the witnesses and thereafter getting acquittal of other co-accused persons he would take the advantage of his such act.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Mukesh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 July, 2019

There are serious allegations against the present applicant of committing rape on the prosecutrix and case of the applicant cannot be tested on the basis of the evidence for acquitted co-accused persons. It is also submitted that in case of Ujagar Singh (supra), charges were as Sections 2 MCRC-30098-2019 498-A, 302/304-B and 201 of IPC concerning the death of Jawahar Singh whereas applicant before the High Court was brother of the husband of the deceased Smt. Sapnadevi and therefore that case of the facts is distinguishable from the facts of the present case.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Women And Child Development Department vs Sitaram Vishwakarma on 26 February, 2016

Learned Single Judge, essentially, relying on the observations made in the decision of the M.P. Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in transfer application No.747/1988 decided on 14.11.1991 held that Instructors are treated as teachers. Perhaps while recording that finding, learned Single Judge in the back of his mind had the decision of this Court in the case of Mahendra Pal Singh Vs. State of M.P. and others , 1987 MPLJ 500. However, the learned Single Judge ought to have also examined the other factors specified by the amended provision of the Fundamental Rule 56 as incorporated vide M.P. Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-ayu) Dwitiya Sanshodhan Adhiniyam, 1998 (No.27 of 1998) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Adhiniyam' for short). The same postulates that Teacher must be a "Government servant" by whatever designation called and appointed for the purpose of "teaching in Government educational institute".
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kalu @ Kallu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 June, 2016

Learned counsel for the applicant placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Ujagar Singh Vs. State of M.P. 2000 (I) MPWN 12 in which it was held that when other accused were tried and acquitted, the acquittal became final and rest of the accused are entitled for bail Learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that though the evidence recorded against the co-accused is not admissible against the present applicant still there are certain findings by the Court which will not change and would apply in the case of the present applicant also. If those findings are taken into consideration the matter softens the rigours of the case against the present applicant.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1