Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.51 seconds)
Documents citing Jayanthi S. vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court And ... on 17 April, 2002

M. Venkatesh And S.R. Duraisamy vs The Presiding Officer, Labour Court And ... on 29 October, 2004

11. On the part of the second respondent/ management, they would come forward to argue to the effect that the petitioners were Apprentices and on completion of the period of Apprenticeship, they were discharged from duty and in these cases on completion of training the employees would be given the certificate of training and therefore this cannot be a regular appointment and this case would fall under Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as it has been concluded in the judgment delivered by a learned single judge of this court reported in S.Jayanthi v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Vellore 7 Anr. (2002 {2} L.L.N. 1164) on similar facts and certain circumstances as they are in the case in hand.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - V Kanagaraj - Full Document

M.Venkatesh vs The Presiding Officer on 29 October, 2004

11. On the part of the second respondent/ management, they would come forward to argue to the effect that the petitioners were Apprentices and on completion of the period of Apprenticeship, they were discharged from duty and in these cases on completion of training the employees would be given the certificate of training and therefore this cannot be a regular appointment and this case would fall under Section 2 (oo) (bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as it has been concluded in the judgment delivered by a learned single judge of this court reported in S.JAYANTHI Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, VELLORE 7 ANOTEHR (2002 {2} L.L.N. 1164) on similar facts and certain circumstances as they are in the case in hand.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - V Kanagaraj - Full Document
1