Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Tanaji Balasaheb Gambhiretanaji ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary Moef on 26 September, 2023

In Writ Petition NO. 1916 of 2012 (Varchman Developers Limited Vs. Union of India & Ors.) and Writ Petition NO. 2809 of 2012 (Nahur Vivekanad Cooperative Housing Society Ltd & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors.) We have rejected a similar contention urged on behalf of the respondent authorities that when the project proponent cannot undertake construction project for more than 20,000 sq. mtrs. of built up area without obtaining prior environmental clearance, the project proponent cannot be allowed to commence the construction within the limits of 20,000 sq. meters, without obtaining prior environmental clearance. This court has held that when clearances are required only for projects with built up area exceeding 20,000 sq. meters, redevelopment projects for residential buildings should not be unnecessarily delayed even to the extent of construction up to 20,000 sq. meters when the developer is ready to give undertaking not to exceed the construction beyond 20,000 sq. meters without first obtaining environmental clearance. This court has noted that the Authorities take considerable time for taking a decision on the application for environmental clearance or for CRZ clearance. In the meantime the redevelopment projects are being delayed. This court has been granting relief in such cases on the basis that even if ultimately the authorities were to reject the applications for clearance, there will be no illegality in so far as the developer has made construction upto 20,000 sq. meters,"
National Green Tribunal Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kapil Sharma vs Union Of India on 11 October, 2023

8. After hearing Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner prima facie it appears to this Court that non-consideration of the representation dated 31/07/2023 preferred by the Petitioner seeking permission u/s 16 of the SCRA, 1956 with regard to transaction relating to 3530 shares of Peerless General Finance Ltd. on the ground of pendency of some Writ Petition No.4342/2017 between Bhagwati Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. UOI, is not justified and is not in consonance with the provisions of section 16 of SCRA, 1956.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M R Phadke - Full Document
1