Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 370 (0.51 seconds)
Documents citing National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Cholleti Bharatamma & Ors on 12 October, 2007

United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Nirmla Devi And Others on 24 September, 2019

"11.The Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Cholleti Bharatamma and others, 2008(1), SCC 423 specifically held that the Insurance Company even in respect of the owner is only liable if such owner travels in the cabin of the truck and not if he is travelling in the rear of the truck. Reference may be made to that portion of the judgment wherein the Apex Court held as follows:-
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

New India Assurance Company Ltd vs Janabai W/O Narayan Patil on 27 September, 2013

On this point reliance is placed on the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Cholleti Bharatmma & Ors and also on the judgment of High Court Andhara pradesh in the case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Karnool Vs. Rathnavath Sali & Ors (supra).The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Cholleti Bharatmma & Ors (supra) has observed in para No. 18 which reads as under. :-
Bombay High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M Bhatkar - Full Document

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Biltan Sao @ Biltan Pd. & Ors on 16 October, 2015

19.In National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Cholleti Bharatamma this Court categorically held: (SCC p.433, paras 27-28 "27. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent, submitted that from the aforementioned finding, it is evident that the respondent was traveling as the owner of the goods. We do not think that the said submission is correct. P.W.2, in his evidence, stated:
Patna High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 2 - S Pandey - Full Document

Mehjabin & Ors vs The New India Assurance Compan on 12 January, 2016

19.In National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Cholleti Bharatamma this Court categorically held: (SCC p.433, paras 27-28 "27. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent, submitted that from the aforementioned finding, it is evident that the respondent was traveling as the owner of the goods. We do not think that the said submission is correct. P.W.2, in his evidence, stated:
Patna High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - S Pandey - Full Document

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Imrat Sonkar on 4 April, 2024

19. Thus, if evidence, as referred and discussed in the preceding paras, is examined in the light of principles of law laid down in Cholleti Bharatamma(supra) and parameters as referred in preceding paras, in this Signature Not Verified Signed by: SARSWATI MEHRA Signing time: 4/18/2024 6:46:35 PM 13 Court's considered opinion, from evidence on record, it is not established at all that injured/deceased were travelling in offending vehicle as owner/representative of goods and in the cabin of vehicle at the time of accident.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - A K Paliwal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next