Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)
Documents citing Chandanmal And Anr. vs Roopnarain on 27 February, 1953

Damodar Prasad And Ors. vs Ram Charan Das And Ors. on 22 November, 1955

This case has been dissented from in Chandanmal v. Roopnarain, AIR 1954 Raj 84 (D). A Division Bench held that the words "leviable on the plaint or memorandum of appeal" mean properly leviable on the plaint, or memorandum of appeal in which the judgment sought to be reviewed is passed, and not on any imaginary plaint, or memorandum of appeal, which might have been presented at the time the review application was filed asking for the same relief as in the application for review.
Patna High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Narayan Tiwari And Ors. vs Vasudeo Narayan Missir And Ors. on 28 February, 1958

As against this there is the contrary view taken by other Courts in India, as is evident from the decisions in Nandi Ram v. Jogendra Chandra Dutta, AIR 1924 Cal 881 (D); Deokinandan v. Jhotha Lal, AIR 1952 All 224 (FB) (E); Ibrahim Ali v. Ahsan Hussain, AIR 1933 Nag 207 (F); Ram Gopal v. Gauri Shankar, AIR 1937 Lah 439 (G); Chandanmal v. Roopnarain, AIR 1954 Raj 84 (H) and Janki Kuar v. Mt. Babni, AIR 1948 Oudh 225 (I).
Patna High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1