Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.38 seconds)

S.K.Bhalla vs State & Ors. on 13 May, 2011

In support of this contention, petitioner has relied upon the judgment of Kerala High Court in the matter of M.M.Haries Vs. State of Kerala, 2005 (4) R.Cr.R. 579. In the said case, the question before the Hon'ble Judge of Kerala High Court was whether writing an obscene and vulgar letter and addressing the same to a woman would fall within the purview of Section 509 IPC and the Hon'ble Judge, after discussing the scope of expression making gesture held that 'writing of said letter would amount to an offence under Section 509 IPC'. In the said judgment, however, not much has been said about the intention as one of the basic ingredients constituting the offence under Section 509 IPC.
Delhi High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 2 - A Bharihoke - Full Document

State vs Rakesh Dhawan on 11 March, 2016

Further the Ld. MM had also failed to appreciate the crux of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Punjab v. Major Singh, AIR 1967, SC 631, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court had defined the term "modesty" in relation to a woman and further the Ld. MM had failed to appreciate the ratio of the case "MM Haries v. State of Kerala" and therefore the Ld. MM had grossly erred in mis­interpreting the term "bloody bitch" allegedly used by the respondent in relation to the complainant and therefore, it has been prayed that the impugned order was liable to be set aside and the respondent was liable to be charged for the offences under sections 504/507/509 IPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1