Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (2.09 seconds)
Documents citing Harbans Singh vs Smt. Tekamani Devi And Ors. on 23 May, 1989

Mrs.Bezawada Supriya, vs The Govt on 3 March, 2022

42) The Delhi High Court in Harbans Singh v. Smt. Shanti Devi15, pointed out in that case that the interest created under an irrevocable power of attorney does not necessarily amount to an interest in the property which is the subject matter of the power of attorney. Unless the document itself created a right in immovable property thereby attracting Section17 of the Registration Act there is no question of the power of attorney becoming compulsorily registerable. The Court examined with respect to Registration Act to find out whether it is compulsorily registerable or not.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 254 - Cited by 0 - P K Mishra - Full Document

Sarawjeet Singh vs Saraswati Builders And Ors. on 21 December, 2001

18. A Division Bench of this court in the case of Harbans Singh v. Shati Devi 1977 RLR 487 had considered the similar question. The main question for consideration before the court was whether the general power of attorney or special power of attorney which had been executed in favor of one Shri Gulati was cancelled validly by a notice or not. This court held that if a person owning a property executes an agreement of sale and executes an irrevocable general power of attorney in respect of the same property in favor of her husband then he cannot cancel or revoke the power of attorney an account of interest or right created in the subject-matter so as to prejudice the said interest. The court had observed and held:-
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A-2459 The Coats Viyella Employees vs Harvey Nagar Residents on 28 November, 2013

In terms of Section 54 r/w. Section 8 of Transfer of Property Act, ordinarily, the title of vendor passes to the vendee on Registration of Sale Deed irrespective of the fact as to whether the consideration made either in whole or part has been paid by the vendee to the vendor are not, subject of course a contrary intention of parties to the said transaction, as per decision HARBANS SINGH V. SMT.TEKAMANI DEVI AND OTHERS (AIR 1990 PATNA 26).
Madras High Court Cites 101 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri.H.S.Shivaramakrishnan vs R.Manoj on 29 July, 2016

25. The other decision relied by the learned counsel for the plaintiff reported in AIR 1990 Patna 26, in the case of Harbans Singh v. Smt.Tekamani Devi and others. In that case also the tenant under original owner in a suit filed by one of the legal heirs for eviction has raised the question denying the jural relationship of landlord and tenant between them. Their lordships have ruled that upon the death of original owner, all his children inherited the property, as parties constituted a joint family governed by Mithakshara School of Hindu Law. One of the legal heirs can file a suit for eviction and tenant is estopped from denying the relationship. Likewise, in this case also the present plaintiff is one of the legal heirs of deceased original owner - Smt.Jayalakshmiammal. After her death and death of her husband - Sri.A.Hariharan, the katha of the property transferred in the name of the plaintiff with the consent by others. Therefore, it is deemed that with the consent of other co-owners he has issued notice terminating the 25 O.S.No.2034/2015 tenancy under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act and he can maintain a suit for eviction.
Bangalore District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajendra Ram And Ors vs Sushila Devi And Ors on 29 February, 2024

(x) Learned senior counsel, Mr. Jha, further relied on the decision of this Court in the case of Devji Shivji v. Karsandas Ramji, reported in AIR 1954 Pat 280 on the point that if a document cannot be rejected as illegal and void, then onus lies on the plaintiff to show that the said document is not actually what it purports to be. Further, Mr. Jha relied on the decision of this Court in the case of Harbans Singh v. Tekamani Devi, reported in AIR 1990 Pat 26 on the proposition that title passes forthwith upon the registration of the deed to the transferee with all the interest which the transferor had been capable of passing in Patna High Court SA No.237 of 2008 dt.29-02-2024 30/42 the property. A sale becomes complete, although the consideration amount or a part thereof has not been paid, but promised to be paid.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - A K Jha - Full Document

M.S. Ananthamurthy vs J. Manjula Etc.Etc on 27 February, 2025

39.To the same effect is the decision of High Court of Delhi in Shri Harbans Singh v. Smt. Shanti Devi, reported in 1977 SCC OnLine Del 102. The High Court while dealing with the question of whether the powers of attorney executed by the appellant were cancelled validly, laid down the conditions of irrevocability of a contract of agency as, (i) authority to agent given for valuable consideration;
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ishraquddin vs Riyazuddin on 17 October, 2025

39. To the same effect is the decision of High Court of Delhi in Shri Harbans Singh v. Smt. Shanti Devi, 1977 SCC OnLine Del 102. The High Court while dealing with the question of whether the powers of attorney executed by the appellant were cancelled validly, laid down the conditions of irrevocability of a contract of agency as, (i) authority to agent given for valuable consideration; (ii) such valuable consideration was given for the purpose of effectuating a security or protecting or securing the interest of the agent; (iii) agency not being irrevocable merely because the agent has some interest in carrying it out or holds a special right, such as a lien or advance, over its subject matter. Thus, the agency has to be specifically meant to secure the agent's benefit or interest. It further observed that the interest of the agent can be inferred from the language of the document or from the course of business between the principal and agent. The observations are reproduced hereinbelow:--
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ishraquddin vs Riyazuddin And Ors on 17 October, 2025

39. To the same effect is the decision of High Court of Delhi in Shri Harbans Singh v. Smt. Shanti Devi, 1977 SCC OnLine Del 102. The High Court while dealing with the question of whether the powers of attorney executed by the appellant were cancelled validly, laid down the conditions of irrevocability of a contract of agency as, (i) authority to agent given for valuable consideration; (ii) such valuable consideration was given for the purpose of effectuating a security or protecting or securing the interest of the agent; (iii) agency not being irrevocable merely because the agent has some interest in carrying it out or holds a special right, such as a lien or advance, over its subject matter. Thus, the agency has to be specifically meant to secure the agent's benefit or interest. It further observed that the interest of the agent can be inferred from the language of the document or from the course of business between the principal and agent. The observations are reproduced hereinbelow:--
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next