The State By vs Came There And Took The Deceased Along ... on 7 February, 2023
3) 2022(O) Supreme Karnataka 443 (Rangaswamy Vs.
State of Karnataka".
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (5.34 seconds)Documents citing
Chidananda Urs B.G vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 August, 2022
Xxxxxx vs State Of Kerala on 16 October, 2023
14. The High Court of Karnataka in Sathish K. and
Others v State of Karnataka [2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 178]
held that an offence under Section 376 IPC can be
permitted to be compounded, in specific circumstances,
which includes a situation where the closure of such a case
would promote the family life of the complainant and the
accused.
Kahar vs State Of Kerala on 16 November, 2023
14. The High Court of Karnataka in Sathish K. and
Others v State of Karnataka [2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 178] held
that an offence under Section 376 IPC can be permitted to be
compounded, in specific circumstances, which includes a
situation where the closure of such a case would promote the
family life of the complainant and the accused.
Venkatesh Shet vs Padmavathi on 17 January, 2024
50. It relied on decision in Guruvappa's case
(supra), for proposition that word 'person' included 'joint
family' as per Explanation-II. It relied on ratio in
Basavaraj M v/s State of Karnataka and Ors., reported
in 1982 (2) KLJ 531, for proposition that there was no
prohibition against member of joint family filing Form
35
no.7. It also referre d to admissio n by DW.1 that Srinivasa
Shet filed Form no.7 in his name, but, it was for his
family.
V Bhaskar vs State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2023
25. This notification was superseded by another
notification dated 19.03.2016 by which the Anti Corruption
Bureau was declared to be the police station under Section
2(s) of Cr.P.C., which was later struck down by a Division
Bench of this Court in Chidanand Urs vs State of
Karnataka and Others (2022)5 KLJ 193(DB). Thus as
the matter stands, the Karnataka Lokayukta for all
practical purposes continues to be a police Station as
defined under Section 2(s) of Cr.P.C.
N Narasimha Murthy vs State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2023
25. This notification was superseded by another
notification dated 19.03.2016 by which the Anti Corruption
Bureau was declared to be the police station under Section
2(s) of Cr.P.C., which was later struck down by a Division
Bench of this Court in Chidanand Urs vs State of
Karnataka and Others (2022)5 KLJ 193(DB). Thus as
the matter stands, the Karnataka Lokayukta for all
practical purposes continues to be a police Station as
defined under Section 2(s) of Cr.P.C.
Smt B Jaya vs State Of Karnataka on 28 July, 2023
In the case of RAMASWAMY G.T (supra), this Court at
paragraphs 22 to 26 and 40 held as follows:
Sri G Linganna vs State Of Karnataka on 28 July, 2023
In the case of RAMASWAMY G.T (supra), this Court at
paragraphs 22 to 26 and 40 held as follows:
A N Prasad vs State Of Karnataka on 28 July, 2023
In the case of RAMASWAMY G.T (supra), this Court at
paragraphs 22 to 26 and 40 held as follows:
Gurushanthappa vs State Of Karnataka on 28 July, 2023
In the case of RAMASWAMY G.T (supra), this Court at
paragraphs 22 to 26 and 40 held as follows: