Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 458 (1.61 seconds)
Documents citing Sonu Gupta vs Deepak Gupta & Ors on 11 February, 2015

____________________________________ vs C.B. Healthcare Through Spa on 16 July, 2025

'4. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. We are of the considered opinion that the High Court erred in allowing the application filed by Respondents 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 and quashing the criminal proceedings against them. A perusal of the FIR would clearly show that the appellant alleged cruelty against Respondents 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. This Court in Sonu Gupta v. Deepak Gupta [Sonu Gupta v. Deepak Gupta, (2015) 3 SCC 424: (2015) 2 SCC (Cri) 265] held as follows: (SCC p. 429, para
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 64 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

____________________________________ vs C.B. Healthcare Through Spa on 16 July, 2025

'4. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. We are of the considered opinion that the High Court erred in allowing the application filed by Respondents 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 and quashing the criminal proceedings against them. A perusal of the FIR would clearly show that the appellant alleged cruelty against Respondents 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. This Court in Sonu Gupta v. Deepak Gupta [Sonu Gupta v. Deepak Gupta, (2015) 3 SCC 424: (2015) 2 SCC (Cri) 265] held as follows: (SCC p. 429, para
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 64 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vijay Malviya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 December, 2023

This Court in the cases of State vs. A. Arun Kumar (2015) 2 SCC 417, Sonu Gupta vs. Deepak Gupta (2015) 3 SCC 424, Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANUPRIYA SHARMA Signing time: 12/12/2023 2:30:54 PM 7 State of Orissa vs. Debendra Nath Padhi (2003) 2 SCC 711 and State of Tamil Nadu vs. Suresh Rajan (2014) 11 SCC 709 has reiterated almost the afore​mentioned principles."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr. Surya Sareen vs The Central Bureau Of Investigation on 2 June, 2025

5. The order passed by the trial court taking cognizance against R-2 and R-4 to R-9 is in conformity with the law laid down in the above judgment. It is settled law that the power under Section 482 CrPC is exercised by the 53 High Court only in exceptional circumstances only when a prima facie case is not made out against the accused. The test applied by this Court for interference at the initial stage of a prosecution is whether the uncontroverted allegations prima facie establish a case.' (emphasis supplied)
Karnataka High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

Sri. Arjun Anjaneya Reddy vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2025

5. The order passed by the trial court taking cognizance against R-2 and R-4 to R-9 is in conformity with the law laid down in the above judgment. It is settled law that the power under Section 482 CrPC is exercised by the High Court only in exceptional circumstances only when a prima facie case is not made out against the accused. The test applied by this Court for interference at the initial stage of a prosecution is whether the uncontroverted allegations prima facie establish a case.' (emphasis supplied)
Karnataka High Court Cites 71 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

____________________________________ vs C.B. Healthcare Through Spa on 16 July, 2025

'4. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. We are of the considered opinion that the High Court erred in allowing the application filed by Respondents 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 and quashing the criminal proceedings against them. A perusal of the FIR would clearly show that the appellant alleged cruelty against Respondents 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. This Court in Sonu Gupta v. Deepak Gupta [Sonu Gupta v. Deepak Gupta, (2015) 3 SCC 424: (2015) 2 SCC (Cri) 265] held as follows: (SCC p. 429, para
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 64 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

____________________________________ vs C.B. Healthcare Through Spa on 16 July, 2025

'4. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. We are of the considered opinion that the High Court erred in allowing the application filed by Respondents 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 and quashing the criminal proceedings against them. A perusal of the FIR would clearly show that the appellant alleged cruelty against Respondents 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. This Court in Sonu Gupta v. Deepak Gupta [Sonu Gupta v. Deepak Gupta, (2015) 3 SCC 424: (2015) 2 SCC (Cri) 265] held as follows: (SCC p. 429, para
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 64 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Reserved On: 22.7.2025 vs Union Of India on 30 July, 2025

5. The order passed by the trial court taking cognisance against R-2 and R-4 to R-9 is in conformity with the law laid down in the above judgment. It is settled law that the power under Section 482 CrPC is exercised by the High Court only in exceptional circumstances only when a prima facie case is not made out against the accused. The test applied by this Court for interference at the initial stage of a prosecution is whether the uncontroverted allegations prima facie establish a case.' (emphasis supplied)
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another on 14 May, 2025

5. The order passed by the trial court taking cognizance against R-2 and R-4 to R-9 is in conformity with the law laid down in the above judgment. It is settled law that the power under Section 482 CrPC is exercised by the High Court only in exceptional circumstances only when a prima facie case is not made out against the accused. The test applied by this Court for interference at the initial stage of a prosecution is whether the uncontroverted allegations prima facie establish a case."
Allahabad High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next