Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 672 (6.93 seconds)
Documents citing Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ... vs Union Of India on 16 October, 2015

Amarjeet Singh Chawla And Anr vs Union Of India And Anr on 24 May, 2022

ANR. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND 3433890 ORS 01.11.2016 TO 31.10.2021 2913/2018 RAJIV SOLANKI & ORS RAJPAL SOLANKI-451314 VS UNION OF INDIA & ANR 01.11.2016 TO 31.10.2021 2913/2018 RAJIV SOLANKI & ORS RAM KUMAR-96189 VS UNION OF INDIA & ANR 01.11.2016 TO 31.10.2021 2915/2018 RAJIV SOLANKI & ORS 48 RAJIV SOLANKI-2154918 VS UNION OF INDIA & ANR 01.11.2016 TO 31.10.2021 2915/2018 RAJIV SOLANKI & ORS RAJPAL SOLANKI-451314 VS UNION OF INDIA & ANR 01.11.2016 TO 31.10.2021 2915/2018 RAJIV SOLANKI & ORS RAM KUMAR-96189 VS UNION OF INDIA & ANR 01.11.2016 TO 31.10.2021 3011/2018 SANJAY KAPOOR AND 49 ANR.VS. UNION OF INDIA AND SANJAY KAPOOR -47651 ORS. 01.11.2016 TO 31.10.2021 3011/2018 SANJAY KAPOOR AND ASHISH CHATURVEDI-
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 606 - Cited by 0 - Manmohan - Full Document

Amarjeet Singh Chawla And Anr vs Union Of India And Anr on 7 July, 2022

-3139392 31.10.2022 1986/2019-PANKAJ KALRA & ORS 01.11.2017 TO NOT KOMAL KALRA-3139420 VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 31.10.2022 APPLICABLE 1996/2019-JATINDER KAUR 01.11.2017 TO NOT 103 JATINDER KAUR-563759 VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 31.10.2022 APPLICABLE 2013/2019-PIA SHARMA 01.11.2017 TO NOT 104 PIA SHARMA-1687475 VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR 31.10.2022 APPLICABLE 2020/2019-RAJEEV BANSAL VS. 01.11.2017 TO NOT 105 RAJEEV BANSAL-302688 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 31.10.2022 APPLICABLE 2027/2019-UMA SHANKAR SHARMA AND ANR. NOT 106 VINAY SINGH -1113482 VS. 01.11.2017 TO APPLICABLE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 31.10.2022 2027/2019-UMA SHANKAR SHARMA AND ANR. NOT UMA SHARMA -1529475 VS. 01.11.2017 TO APPLICABLE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 31.10.2022 2069/2019-RAMAN SOKHAL AND RAMAN SOKHAL- NOT 107 ANR. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND 01.11.2017 TO 661199 APPLICABLE ANR. 31.10.2022 2069/2019-RAMAN SOKHAL AND 01.11.2017 TO NOT VINOD KUMAR -671329 ANR. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND 31.10.2022 APPLICABLE Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Page 240 of 327 Signing Date:11.07.2022 13:53:43 ANR.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 370 - Cited by 40 - Manmohan - Full Document

214Th Report On Proposal For Reconsideration Of Judges Case I, Ii And Iii - S P Gupta ...

1. From what has been stated above it is clear that an entire reconsideration I, II & III judges cases - S.P. Gupta Vs UOI reported in AIR 1982 Supreme Court 149, Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association Vs UOI reported in 1993(4) SCC 441 and Special Reference 1 of 1998 reported in 1998(7) SCC 49 739, is urgently and immediately called for in order to bring about clarity and consistency in the process of Appointment of Supreme Court and High Court Judges.
Law Commission Report Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahender Yadav vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 4 November, 2016

208. The view that we have taken is supported by the observations of the Supreme Court in (2016) 5 SCC 808, Supreme Court Advocate on Record Association v. Union of India. While concerned with the right to waive the objection to disqualify adjudicator, in para 30, the court has laid down that who can object as well as when such objection would be tenable in the following terms :
Delhi High Court Cites 71 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cen.Pub.Information Officer,Sci . vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal on 13 November, 2019

In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v Union of India31 (‗NJAC‘), a Constitution Bench of this Court struck down the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act setting up the National Judicial Appointments Commission as ultra vires the Constitution by a four-to-one majority. Significantly, Justice Kurian Joseph, in his separate concurring opinion and Justice Chelameswar, in his dissenting opinion, pointed to the lack of transparency and accountability in the manner of making appointments to the judiciary. Justice Kurian Joseph observed:
Supreme Court of India Cites 147 - Cited by 4 - S Khanna - Full Document

M/S Trimurthi Fragrances (P) Ltd. ... vs Govt.Of N.C.T Of Delhi Through Its ... on 19 September, 2022

ii) What should be the proper guidelines for the future for overruling an earlier decision of this Court, and to what extent should the Courts be guided by the propositions in Ningappa Ramappa Kurbar v. Emperor6, the observations of Lokur, J. in Supreme Court Advocates­on­Record Assn. v Union of India 7 and the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Harper v. National Coal Board8.
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 3 - I Banerjee - Full Document

Anoop Baranwal vs Union Of India Ministry Of Law And ... on 2 March, 2023

202. It issued various guidelines also for the protection of the Members of the Subordinate Judiciary. The decision in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and others v. Union of India71 related to the appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court and High Court and transfer of Judges and Chief Justices. In the majority opinion of Justice J. S. Verma, we may notice the following:
Supreme Court of India Cites 270 - Cited by 6 - K Joseph - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next