Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Narayan Tewary vs State Of West Bengal on 13 January, 1954

Ghisa And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 April, 1975

Barring the inconsequential narrations, the substratum of their evidence has throughout been consistent. I do not have any reason to take a different view of the evidence from that taken by the courts below. The trial court as well as the first appellate court have taken into consideration the infirmities pointed out by the learned Counsel in the statements of the witnesses and have found them reliable concerning the petitioners. His Lordship Hon'ble Venkatarma Ayyar J., speaking for the Court in Narayan Tewary v. State of West Bengal laid down the law this:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ghisa And Ors. vs The State Of Rajasthan on 25 April, 1975

In their cross-examination they have emerged with credit, Barring the unconsequential narrations, the substratum of their evidence has throughout been consistent. I do not have any reason to take a different view of the evidence from that taken by the courts below. The trial court as well as the first appellate court have taken into consideration the infirmities pointed out by the learned Counsel in the statements of the witnesses and have found them reliable concerning the petitioners. His Lordship Hon'ble Venkatarama Ayyar J., speaking for the Court in. Narayan Tewary v. State of West Bengal laid down the law thus:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Shri Ram Kishore And Anr. vs State on 18 January, 1973

6. The two courts below have relied upon certain facts, that the Chabutra was used by the public for going upto the temple and for performing the festival of Gugga Naumi, that no obstruction was caused by the petitioners or their predecessors-in-title till recently to the public going there and exercising these rights and that the petitioners have now stacked bricks and that has caused obstruction to the public in the exercise of its rights. The findings of facts arrived at in the courts below cannot be interfered with in revisional jurisdiction. For this there is ample authority and I need only refer to Narayan Tewary v. State of West Bengal . When the Trial Court has dealt with the matter fully and was satisfied with the evidence produced that no reliable evidence existed in support of such denial it would not be proper for the High Court to interfere in that finding of fact which was alsof affirmed by the learned Sessions Judge.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1