Mohdd. Sadiq vs The State Of Telanagana on 1 April, 2019
The petitioner is accused in CC No.976 of 2009 taken cognizance
for the offence punishable under Sections 290, 323, 352, 504 and part-I
of 506 IPC. All are triable as summons cases which is outcome of the
cognizance order of the learned Magistrate under Section 200 Cr.P.C. in
issuing summons under Section 204 Cr.P.C based on private complaint of
the second respondent against four accused including the petitioner-A1
leave about R.3 to R.5 of the revision not necessary parties the other
accused. So far as the summery trial and summons trial is concerned,
there is no difference between case proceeded on police report or on
private complaint but for to the extent in relating to Section 258 Cr.P.C.
of stoppage of proceedings in summary trial or summons case only arises
in case arising of police report and in not for private complaint cases that
was in fact clarified by this Court in Deevi Srinivasa Rai Radha Lakshmi
Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, 2015(2) ALD (Crl.) page No.159.