Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.68 seconds)
Documents citing Swatantra Kumar Singh vs Gorakhpur Kshetriya Gramin Bank And ... on 10 May, 2000

WP(C)/5287/2012 on 21 February, 2024

He further refers to the judgment of the Allahabad High Court rendered in Swatantra Kumar Singh Vs Gorakpur Kshetriya Gramin Bank, reported in [2000] 0 Supreme (AII) 703 and Ashok Kumar Srivastava Vs. Rae Bareilly Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Rae Bareilly, reported in [2006] 0 Supreme (AII) 2004 to buttress his submissions. Both the judgments of the W.P(C) No. 5287/2012 Page | 12 Allahabad High Court were pressed into the service initially by the petitioner in support of his arguments that the regulations under which the Enquiry had proceeded, namely the Officers and Employee Service Regulations 2006, was never notified as is required Section 30 of the Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976 However, subsequently the learned counsel of the petitioner submitted on instructions that these regulations were duly notified and therefore he did not seek to press these contentions any further.
Gauhati High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - S Saikia - Full Document

Surendra Pal Singh vs Milk Commissioner, U.P., Lucknow & Anr. on 1 May, 2014

^^21& (1) lsok esa fdlh in ij fdlh ekSfyd fjfDr esa] ;k mlds izfr] fu;qDr fd;s tkus ij izR;sd O;fDr dks nks o"kZ dh vof/k ds fy;s ifjoh{kk ij j[kk tk;sxkA (2) fu;qfer izkf/kdkjh ,sls dkj.kksa ls tks Jfefyf[kr fd;s tk;saxh] vyx&vyx ekeyksa esa ifjoh{kk&vof/k c<+k ldrk gS ftlesa ,slk fnukad fofufn"V fd;k tk;sxk tc rd fd vof/k c<+k;h tk;% ijUrq] Jkiokfnd ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds flok;] ifjoh{kk&vof/k ,d o"kZ ls vf/kd vkSj] fdlh Hkh ifjfLFkfr esa] nks o"kZ ls vf/kd ugha c<+kbZ tk;sxhA (3) ;fn ifjoh{kk&vof/k c<+kbZ xbZ ifjoh{kk&vof/k ds nkSjku fdlh Hkh le; ;k mlds vUr esa fu;qfDr izkf/kdkjh dks ;g izrhr gks fd ifjoh{kk/khu O;fDr us vius voljksa dk i;kZIr mi;ksx ugh fd;k ;k larks"k iznku djus esa vU;Fkk foQy jgk gS rks mls mlds ekSfyd in ij ;fn dksbZ] gks izR;kofrZr fd;k tk ldrk gS vkSj ;fn mldk fdlh in ij /kkj.kkf/kdkj u gks rks mldh lsok;sa lekIr dh tk ldrh gSA (4) mifu;e (3) ds v/khu ftl ifjoh{kk/khu O;fDr dks izR;kofrZr fd;k tk; ;k ftldh lsok;sa lekIr dh tk;sa] og fdlh izfrdj dk gdnkj u gksxkA (5) fu;qfDr izkf/kdkjh laoxZ esa lfEefyr fdlh in ij ;k fdlh vU; led{k ;k mPprj in ij LFkkukiUu ;k vLFkk;h :i esa dh xbZ fujUrj lsok dks ifjoh{kk vof/k dh lax.kuk djus ds iz;ksxkFkZ fxus tkus dh vuqefr ns ldrk gSA** Therefore, in view of the law laid down by this Hon'ble Court in case of Swatantra Kumar Singh Vs. Gorakhpur Kshetriya Gramin Bank reported in 2000 (2) UPLBEC page 674 the services of the petitioner would be deemed to be confirmed after the expiry of the period of 2 years from 10.12.2001, though no specific order was passed by the respondents for the confirmation of services of the petitioner and other similarly situated persons on the post of Milk Inspector. As a matter of fact no orders have been passed for confirming the services of the employees working on the post of Government Milk Supervisor or Milk Inspector or Senior Milk Inspector.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document
1