Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.60 seconds)
Documents citing Maharishi Markandeshwar University & ... vs State Of H.P And Others on 20 May, 2020

Srinivasan Medical College And ... vs Union Of India on 29 April, 2022

93.I draw support in this regard from a judgement of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Maharishi Markandeshwar University(supra) (in short ‘MMU’) on very similar facts and legal position as before me. The facts in the case of MMU are similar to those to this case. MMU had also established a constituent medical college that had conformed to the processes set out under the Maharishi Markandeshwar University (Establishment and Regulation) Act, 2010 (in short ‘2010 Act’). The State Government as well as all other Regulatory bodies has consented to, and approved the setting up of the medical college.
Madras High Court Cites 73 - Cited by 0 - A Sumanth - Full Document

Srinivasan Medical College And ... vs Union Of India on 29 April, 2022

93. I draw support in this regard from a judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Maharishi Markandeshwar University (supra) (in short ‘MMU’) on very similar facts and legal position as before me. The facts in the case of MMU are similar to those to this case. MMU had also established a constituent medical college that had conformed to the processes set out under the Maharishi Markandeshwar University (Establishment and Regulation) Act, 2010 (in short ‘2010 Act’). The State Government as well as all other Regulatory bodies has consented to, and approved the setting up of the medical college.
Madras High Court Cites 73 - Cited by 0 - A Sumanth - Full Document

Maharishi Markandeshwar University ... vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 7 January, 2021

10. Yet in another case titled Mahrishi Markandey University and another vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others (CWP ::: Downloaded on - 07/01/2021 20:38:25 :::HCHP 18 No. 4119 of 2020), Division Bench of this Court, while dealing with prayer of petitioners to allow them to admit 15% of total intake as NRI seats again reiterated that petitioner-University .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document

Chandibhamar Abhay Sanjaykumar vs State Of Gujarat on 9 August, 2023

4.6 Learned Senior Advocate would also rely upon the decision of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in case of Maharishi Markandeshwar Page 8 of 26 Downloaded on : Sun Sep 17 00:48:11 IST 2023 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/13177/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/08/2023 undefined University and Another Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others, reported in 2020 SCC Online HP 2495, whereby the High Court of Himachal Pradesh had inter alia laid down that principles as laid down in case of Consortium of Deemed Universities in Karnataka (supra), could not be stated to be applicable to the deemed universities only. 4.7 Learned Senior Advocate would thus submit that since the term 'ward' has not been defined or explained in the Gujarat Medical Admission Act, 2007, and whereas in reply to the representation preferred by the petitioner, it has been informed that the State interprets the term 'ward' as per the definition appearing in the Guardians and Wards Act. That on the other hand, there are two decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court, which have been followed by the Central Government and whereas in view of Entry No. 25 in List III read with Entry No. 66 in List I of the 7 th Schedule, since the primacy is of the Central Government, therefore any provision to the contrary by the State would be of no consequence.
Gujarat High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - N Kariel - Full Document

Devbir Singh vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 10 September, 2024

31 of 34 ::: Downloaded on - 22-09-2024 07:10:23 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:118234-DB CWP No.20041 of 2024(O&M) and other connected cases -32- 3.18 Similarly, the reliance placed on Division Bench of Himachal Pradesh High Court in Maharishi Markdndeshwar University and another vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 2020 SCC OnLine HP, 2495 is incorrect because the aforesaid judgment is based on no objection by State. Basically, it's a consent order passed by the Court in the peculiar facts of the case.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A Kshetarpal - Full Document

Maharishi vs State Of H.P. And Others' on 22 November, 2021

2. Records reveal that even though the Fee Structure Committee held on 22.09.2021 has approved the fee structure for the Course of MBBS and other Medical Courses in respect of Maharishi Markandeshwar University and also in respect of Baddi University and Career Point University for the Academic Session 2021-22. But, the fee so fixed is far less than the one which had been fixed for the previous year, more particularly, 2019-2020. Why the fee rather than being increased by 10%, as was directed by this Court vide its judgment dated 20.05.2020, in a batch of petitions, lead being CWP No. 1465 of 2018 titled 'Maharishi Markandeshwar University and another vs. State of H.P. and others', has been decreased is not at all forthcoming, even in the proceedings of the meeting which have been placed on record and are available at pages 133 to 135 of the paper book.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Adesh Institute Of Medical Sciences And ... vs Union Of India And Ors on 30 December, 2022

It has been contended by counsel for the petitioner that respondent No.5 after seeking admission in the second round, has surrendered the seat and on account of the same, one seat has fallen vacant. He has approached this Court praying that thereafter the petitioner/College has filed representation before respondent No.3, i.e. Baba Farid University, Faridkot, to declare the surrendered seat as vacant, however, till date, despite number of representations, no call has been taken. He submits that portal is open till 31.12.2022 and till date, no decision has been taken by the respondent/University on the representations filed by the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner/College would suffer an irreparable loss, if the 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 30-12-2022 23:37:59 ::: CWP-30380-2022 -2- seat is not filled up. He relies upon the order passed by Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla in CWP No.2616 of 2020, decided on 28.07.2020 (Maharishi Markandeshwar University and another vs State of Himachal Pradesh and others) and an interim order passed by this Court in CWP No.30345 of 2022, on 26.12.2022, Annexure P-17.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Bhardwaj - Full Document

Mmu vs State Of H.P And Others on 9 March, 2026

Mr. Hirdya Ram, learned counsel for newly impleaded respondents submits that in view of decision of Hon'ble Court in LPA No.57 of 2024, more particularly, paras No. 21 & 22 whereby the judgment dated 24.06.2021 rendered in CWP No.626 of 2021 (Maharishi Markandeshwar University and another versus State of H.P and others) has been set- aside only to the extent of direction no.(b) issued under para- 5 thereof, the newly impleaded respondents be given four ::: Downloaded on - 09/03/2026 20:33:53 :::CIS .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - J R Dua - Full Document
1   2 Next