Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.38 seconds)
Documents citing Mohammed Ali Raheman @ Mohammedali ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 24 March, 2021

Eknath Bhalchandra Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra on 16 June, 2023

5. Per contra, learned APP submitted that the applicant is in the business of supplying prohibited substances. It is necessary to unearth traces of larger supply of banned substances. He submitted that the coordinate Benches of this Court in case of Sagar Sadashiv Kore v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6568 and in Ankush v. State, thr PSO, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11384 and unreported judgment of this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.483 of 2021 (Mohammed Ali Raheman Alias MohammedAli Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra) decided on 24 March 2021 refused to grant pre-arrest protection to the applicants therein having similar role attributed to the applicants therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Pankaj Walchand Suryawanshi vs The State Of Maharashtra on 16 June, 2023

5. Per contra, learned APP submitted that the applicant is in the business of supplying prohibited substances. It is necessary to unearth traces of larger supply of banned substances. He submitted that the coordinate Benches of this Court in case of Sagar Sadashiv Kore v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6568 and in Ankush v. State, thr PSO, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11384 and unreported judgment of this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.483 of 2021 (Mohammed Ali Raheman Alias MohammedAli Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra) decided on 24 March 2021 refused to grant pre-arrest protection to the applicants therein having similar role attributed to the applicants therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Mayur Rishikumar Agarwal vs The State Of Maharashtra on 16 June, 2023

5. Per contra, learned APP submitted that the applicant is in the 2 ::: Uploaded on - 17/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 17/06/2023 22:32:28 ::: 39-aba837-2023.doc business of supplying prohibited substances. It is necessary to unearth traces of larger supply of banned substances. He submitted that the coordinate Benches of this Court in case of Sagar Sadashiv Kore v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6568 and in Ankush v. State, thr PSO, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11384 and unreported judgment of this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.483 of 2021 (Mohammed Ali Raheman Alias MohammedAli Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra) decided on 24 March 2021 refused to grant pre-arrest protection to the applicants therein having similar role attributed to the applicants therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Sayyed Aarif Sayyed Umar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 June, 2023

5. Per contra, learned APP submitted that the applicant is in the business of supplying prohibited substances. It is necessary to unearth traces of larger supply of banned substances. He submitted that the coordinate Benches of this Court in case of Sagar Sadashiv Kore v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6568 and in Ankush v. State, thr PSO, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11384 and unreported judgment of this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.483 of 2021 (Mohammed Ali Raheman Alias MohammedAli Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra) decided on 24 March 2021 refused to grant pre-arrest protection to the applicants therein having similar role attributed to the applicants therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Sagar Balasaheb Nevase vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 June, 2023

5. Per contra, learned APP submitted that the applicant is in the business of supplying prohibited substances. It is necessary to unearth traces of larger supply of banned substances. He submitted that the coordinate Benches of this Court in case of Sagar Sadashiv Kore v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6568 and in Ankush v. State, thr PSO, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11384 and unreported judgment of this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.483 of 2021 (Mohammed Ali Raheman Alias MohammedAli Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra) decided on 24 March 2021 refused to grant pre-arrest protection to the applicants therein having similar role attributed to the applicants therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Rajendra Jambu Jakate vs State Of Maharashtra on 28 June, 2023

5. Per contra, learned APP submitted that the applicant is in the business of supplying prohibited substances. It is necessary to unearth traces of larger supply of banned substances. He submitted that the coordinate Benches of this Court in case of Sagar Sadashiv Kore v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2 ::: Uploaded on - 30/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 30/06/2023 14:47:20 ::: 19-aba1113-2023.doc 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6568 and in Ankush v. State, thr PSO, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11384 and Pathan Shafi Khan Rehemat Khan v. State of Maharashtra reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom13367 and unreported judgment of this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.483 of 2021 (Mohammed Ali Raheman Alias MohammedAli Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra) decided on 24 March 2021 refused to grant pre-arrest protection to the applicants therein having similar role attributed to the applicants therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Ramvilas S Lohiya vs The State Of Maharashtra on 5 July, 2023

5. Per contra, learned APP submitted that the applicants are in the business of supplying prohibited substances. It is necessary to 2 ::: Uploaded on - 05/07/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 06/07/2023 15:38:02 ::: 902-aba1804-2023.doc unearth traces of larger supply of banned substances. He submitted that the coordinate Benches of this Court in case of Sagar Sadashiv Kore v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6568 and in Ankush v. State, thr PSO, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11384 and Pathan Shafi Khan Rehemat Khan v. State of Maharashtra reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom13367 and unreported judgment of this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.483 of 2021 (Mohammed Ali Raheman Alias MohammedAli Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra) decided on 24 March 2021 refused to grant pre-arrest protection to the applicants therein having similar role attributed to the applicants therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Guddu @ Raj Iliyas Sayyad vs State Of Maharashtra on 5 July, 2023

5. Per contra, learned APP submitted that the applicants are in the business of supplying prohibited substances. It is necessary to 2 ::: Uploaded on - 05/07/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 06/07/2023 15:37:58 ::: 902-aba1804-2023.doc unearth traces of larger supply of banned substances. He submitted that the coordinate Benches of this Court in case of Sagar Sadashiv Kore v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6568 and in Ankush v. State, thr PSO, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11384 and Pathan Shafi Khan Rehemat Khan v. State of Maharashtra reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom13367 and unreported judgment of this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.483 of 2021 (Mohammed Ali Raheman Alias MohammedAli Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra) decided on 24 March 2021 refused to grant pre-arrest protection to the applicants therein having similar role attributed to the applicants therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Mohan Namdev Ghare vs State Of Maharashtra on 6 July, 2023

5. Per contra, learned APP submitted that the applicant is in the business of supplying prohibited substances. It is necessary to unearth traces of larger supply of banned substances. He submitted that the coordinate Benches of this Court in case of Sagar Sadashiv Kore v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6568 and in Ankush v. State, thr PSO, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11384 and Pathan Shafi Khan Rehemat Khan v. State of Maharashtra reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom13367 and unreported judgment of this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.483 of 2021 (Mohammed Ali Raheman Alias MohammedAli Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra) decided on 24 March 2021 2 ::: Uploaded on - 06/07/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 07/07/2023 19:15:35 ::: 37-aba1297-2023.doc refused to grant pre-arrest protection to the applicants therein having similar role attributed to the applicants therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document

Nilesh Harkchand Lalwani vs The State Of Maharashtra on 10 July, 2023

5. Per contra, learned APP submitted that the applicant is the owner of the prohibited substances. It is necessary to unearth traces of larger supply of banned substances. He submitted that the coordinate Benches of this Court in case of Sagar Sadashiv Kore v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6568 and in Ankush v. State, thr PSO, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 11384 and Pathan Shafi Khan Rehemat Khan v. State of Maharashtra reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Bom13367 and unreported judgment of this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.483 of 2021 (Mohammed Ali Raheman Alias MohammedAli Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra) decided on 24 March 2021 refused to grant pre- arrest protection to the applicants therein having similar role 2 ::: Uploaded on - 11/07/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 11/07/2023 22:10:09 ::: 6-aba913-2023.doc attributed to the applicants therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A B Borkar - Full Document
1   2 Next