Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.35 seconds)

State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Minor ... vs Bideshi Ram on 9 October, 2025

In view of the aforesaid, as the writ petition of the respondent/ petitioner was allowed with reference to the decision in writ petition no. 1494 (S/S) of 2012; Sheel Virendra Nath vs. State of U.P. and ors. which was based on the decision of this Court in the case of writ petition no. 410 (S/B) of 2010; Hridayesh Dayal Srivastava vs. State of U.P. and ors., which has already been considered by the Full Bench, and declared to be not good law, accordingly, we dispose of this appeal in terms of the Full Bench judgment dated 18.05.2023 and set aside the impugned judgment dated 20.08.2015.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R Roy - Full Document

Anukul Prakash vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. ... on 18 May, 2023

The only question involved therein was counting of past services for the purposes of pay protection and, as, the Government Order dated 11.11.1993 itself protected the last pay drawn, therefore, there could be no qualm about the claim raised in Hridayesh Dayal Srivastava (supra), but, the said judgment cannot be understood as laying down any precedent so far as the question before us is concerned. Even otherwise in view of the enunciation of law by us hereinabove, any opinion expressed therein contrary to it is not good law.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - R Roy - Full Document
1