S: 1. Sri Siddarooda Ashrama vs Special Land Acquisition Officer on 14 December, 2018
in question and the revenue officers i.e., Tahsildar and Asst.
Commissioner, in proceedings with-regard to the mutation
entries and entries in the record of rights of the property in
question cannot confer title to the land in question and the
order passed by the Revenue Officers under Ex.P.5, Ex.P.7
and Ex.P.8 are not conferring the title of the property in
question, in-favour of claimants 2 to 8, has placed the
reliance on the ruling reported in (1) ILR 2005 KAR 60 (in the
case of J.M. Narayana and others Vs. Corporation of the City
of Bengaluru, By its Commissioner Officer, Bengaluru and
others; (2) 2006(4) Karnataka Law Journal 330 (in the case of
Smt. Papamma Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Chitradurga and
others; (3) ILR 1998 KAR 1 (S.C.)