Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.67 seconds)
Documents citing Jai Adarsh Shikshak Prashiksha vs The National Council For Teach on 23 December, 2010

Smt Vinod College Of Girls vs N C T E And Anr on 9 July, 2013

***** Counsel for petitioners submits that the question which they have raised in the instant petitions came up for consideration before a Single Bench of this court in Adarsh Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidayalaya Vs. National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. (CWP-8236/2012) decided on 26.9.2012 and it has been observed that the application submitted by the Institution has to be considered by the respondent independently without taking recourse to the policy of the State Government dt. 17.11.2008 & 03.01.2009 respectively. The operative part whereof being relevant for the present purpose reads ad infra:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Akash Deep Shikshan Sansthan vs N C T E And Anr on 9 July, 2013

***** Counsel for petitioners submits that the question which they have raised in the instant petitions came up for consideration before a Single Bench of this court in Adarsh Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidayalaya Vs. National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. (CWP-8236/2012) decided on 26.9.2012 and it has been observed that the application submitted by the Institution has to be considered by the respondent independently without taking recourse to the policy of the State Government dt. 17.11.2008 & 03.01.2009 respectively. The operative part whereof being relevant for the present purpose reads ad infra:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Sharma Modern Mahila Shikshan vs N C T E And Anr on 9 July, 2013

***** Counsel for petitioners submits that the question which they have raised in the instant petitions came up for consideration before a Single Bench of this court in Adarsh Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidayalaya Vs. National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. (CWP-8236/2012) decided on 26.9.2012 and it has been observed that the application submitted by the Institution has to be considered by the respondent independently without taking recourse to the policy of the State Government dt. 17.11.2008 & 03.01.2009 respectively. The operative part whereof being relevant for the present purpose reads ad infra:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Sant Radha Raman Teachaer vs N C T E And Anr on 9 July, 2013

***** Counsel for petitioners submits that the question which they have raised in the instant petitions came up for consideration before a Single Bench of this court in Adarsh Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidayalaya Vs. National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. (CWP-8236/2012) decided on 26.9.2012 and it has been observed that the application submitted by the Institution has to be considered by the respondent independently without taking recourse to the policy of the State Government dt. 17.11.2008 & 03.01.2009 respectively. The operative part whereof being relevant for the present purpose reads ad infra:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Shri Ram Techer Training vs N C E T And Anr on 9 July, 2013

***** Counsel for petitioners submits that the question which they have raised in the instant petitions came up for consideration before a Single Bench of this court in Adarsh Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidayalaya Vs. National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. (CWP-8236/2012) decided on 26.9.2012 and it has been observed that the application submitted by the Institution has to be considered by the respondent independently without taking recourse to the policy of the State Government dt. 17.11.2008 & 03.01.2009 respectively. The operative part whereof being relevant for the present purpose reads ad infra:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Shri Guruteg Bahadur Social vs N C T E And Anr on 9 July, 2013

***** Counsel for petitioners submits that the question which they have raised in the instant petitions came up for consideration before a Single Bench of this court in Adarsh Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidayalaya Vs. National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. (CWP-8236/2012) decided on 26.9.2012 and it has been observed that the application submitted by the Institution has to be considered by the respondent independently without taking recourse to the policy of the State Government dt. 17.11.2008 & 03.01.2009 respectively. The operative part whereof being relevant for the present purpose reads ad infra:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Vikas T T College vs N C T E And Anr on 9 July, 2013

***** Counsel for petitioners submits that the question which they have raised in the instant petitions came up for consideration before a Single Bench of this court in Adarsh Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidayalaya Vs. National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. (CWP-8236/2012) decided on 26.9.2012 and it has been observed that the application submitted by the Institution has to be considered by the respondent independently without taking recourse to the policy of the State Government dt. 17.11.2008 & 03.01.2009 respectively. The operative part whereof being relevant for the present purpose reads ad infra:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Brilliants Academy Shikshan vs N C T E And Anr on 9 July, 2013

***** Counsel for petitioners submits that the question which they have raised in the instant petitions came up for consideration before a Single Bench of this court in Adarsh Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidayalaya Vs. National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. (CWP-8236/2012) decided on 26.9.2012 and it has been observed that the application submitted by the Institution has to be considered by the respondent independently without taking recourse to the policy of the State Government dt. 17.11.2008 & 03.01.2009 respectively. The operative part whereof being relevant for the present purpose reads ad infra:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Sharda Co Education Techer vs N C T E And Anr on 9 July, 2013

***** Counsel for petitioners submits that the question which they have raised in the instant petitions came up for consideration before a Single Bench of this court in Adarsh Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidayalaya Vs. National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. (CWP-8236/2012) decided on 26.9.2012 and it has been observed that the application submitted by the Institution has to be considered by the respondent independently without taking recourse to the policy of the State Government dt. 17.11.2008 & 03.01.2009 respectively. The operative part whereof being relevant for the present purpose reads ad infra:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Nehru Teacher Training College vs National Council For Tech Edu Anr on 17 July, 2013

Counsel for parties jointly submits that the question raised in the instant petition came up for consideration before the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Adarsh Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidayalaya Vs. National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. (CWP-8236/2012) decided on 26.9.2012 and it has been observed that the application submitted by the Institution has to be considered by the respondent independently without taking recourse to the policy of the State Government dt.17.11.2008 & 03.01.2009 respectively. The operative part whereof being relevant for the present purpose reads ad infra:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Rastogi - Full Document
1   2 3 Next