Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.54 seconds)
Documents citing Gulshan Rai Monga vs Sanjay Malhotra & Ors. on 4 February, 2015

Smt. Kusum Lata Jain vs Sh. Kamal Prakash Saxena on 31 March, 2016

In Gulshan Rai Monga Vs. Sanjay Malhotra & Ors. 2015(1) CLJ 31 (NOC) Del. the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi held that where a landlord made a categorical statement that he has alternative house or shop, which were neither vacant nor suitable, but the suit premises was suitable for his need or business purpose, court would not interfere because landlord is the best judge or his requirement for residential or business purpose.
Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Kusum Lata Jain vs Sh. Rawat Mal Nahata on 31 March, 2016

In Gulshan Rai Monga Vs. Sanjay Malhotra & Ors. 2015(1) CLJ 31 (NOC) Del. the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi held that where a landlord made a categorical statement that he has alternative house or shop, which were neither vacant nor suitable, but the suit premises was suitable for his need or business purpose, court would not interfere because landlord is the best judge or his requirement for residential or business purpose.
Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chandra Kanta Agarwala vs Kamlesh Kumar Jain on 5 May, 2016

In Gulshan Rai Monga Vs. Sanjay Malhotra & Ors. 2015(1) CLJ 31 (NOC) Del. the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi held that where a landlord made a categorical statement that he has alternative house or shop, which were neither vacant nor suitable, but the suit premises was suitable for his need or business purpose, court would not interfere because landlord is the best judge or his requirement for residential or business purpose.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chandra Kanta Agarwala vs A.M. Electricals on 5 May, 2016

In Gulshan Rai Monga Vs. Sanjay Malhotra & Ors. 2015(1) CLJ 31 (NOC) Del. the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi held that where a landlord made a categorical statement that he has alternative house or shop, which were neither vacant nor suitable, but the suit premises was suitable for his need or business purpose, court would not interfere because landlord is the best judge or his requirement for residential or business purpose.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pawan Kumar Verma vs Surender Mohan And Anr. on 27 August, 2016

27. Further in Gulshan Rai Monga Vs Sanjay Malhotra and   Ors.  226(2016)   DLT  611,   para  17  is relevant   which  is reproduced as below:­ ''In Prativa Devi (Smt) v. T.V. Krishnan, (1996)5 SCC 353   on   an   observation   of   the   High   Court   that   the landlady therein being aged 70 years and as there was no one to look after her therefore she should continue to   live   as   a   guest   with   a   family   friend,   the  Supreme Court noted  that the landlord is the best Judge of his residential requirement and he has complete freedom in the matter.  It is no concern of the Courts to dictate to the landlord how and in what manner he should live or to prescribe for him a residential standard of their own.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bharat Tyagi vs K.K.Bhatia on 2 April, 2025

It is argued that the petitioner is not obliged to give each and every detail of the business proposed to be done by his grandson and the evidence qua him having all the necessary know-how of the business has already been filed in this case. As such, it is prayed that the petition be allowed. 9.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon Kanji Manji vs. Trustees of the Port of Bombay MANU/SC/0337/1962, Inder Pal Khanna vs. Bhupinder Singh Rekhi MANU/DE/1090/2008, Gulshan Rai Monga vs. Sanjay Malhotra MANU/DE/1150/2015, Rajkumar Khaitan vs. Bibi Zubeida Khatoon AIR 1995 SC 576, Gurcharan Lal Kumar vs. Srimati Satyawati 2013 (2) RCT (Rent) 120, Dwarkaprasad vs. Niranjan MANU/SC/0195/2003, Mehmooda Gulshan vs. Javind Hussain Mungloo (2017) 5 SCC 683, Sait Nagjee Purushottan vs. Vimalbhai Digitally signed by RC ARC No. 86/2018 Bharat Tyagi vs. K.K. Bhatia Page No. 7 of 24 DEV DEV CHAUDHARY CHAUDHARY Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next